From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
Cc: corbet@lwn.net, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: test.h - fix warnings
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:33:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200413193325.GA74301@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200409212737.1943-1-l.rubusch@gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 09:27:37PM +0000, Lothar Rubusch wrote:
> Fix warnings at 'make htmldocs', and formatting issues in the resulting
> documentation.
>
> - test.h: Fix some typos in kernel-doc parameter description.
>
> - Documentation/*.rst: Fixing formatting issues, and a duplicate label
> issue, since using sphinx.ext.autosectionlabel in conf.py, referes to
> headers are generated automatically and sphinx will not complain about
> identical headers among documents anymore.
>
> The downside is, automatically generated header labels within one
> document now cannot be overwritten manually anymore. Thus duplicate
> headers within one document have to have different wording, i.e. this
> patch modifies some headers.
>
> - Documentation/api/*: Flipping over to a page "API" containing a single
> link to another page "API" seems like a formatting issue. The patch
> removes one level of indirection.
>
> v2: Several documentation fixes
>
> v3: Do not touch API documentation index
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 13 ++++++++-----
> Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst | 4 ++--
> include/kunit/test.h | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> index e1c5ce80ce12..bb112cf70624 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
> @@ -32,15 +32,17 @@ test targets as well. The ``.kunitconfig`` should also contain any other config
> options required by the tests.
>
> A good starting point for a ``.kunitconfig`` is the KUnit defconfig:
> +
> .. code-block:: bash
>
> cd $PATH_TO_LINUX_REPO
> cp arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig .kunitconfig
>
> You can then add any other Kconfig options you wish, e.g.:
> +
> .. code-block:: none
>
> - CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
> + CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST=y
>
> :doc:`kunit_tool <kunit-tool>` will ensure that all config options set in
> ``.kunitconfig`` are set in the kernel ``.config`` before running the tests.
> @@ -54,8 +56,8 @@ using.
> other tools (such as make menuconfig) to adjust other config options.
>
>
> -Running the tests
> ------------------
> +Running the tests (KUnit Wrapper)
> +---------------------------------
>
> To make sure that everything is set up correctly, simply invoke the Python
> wrapper from your kernel repo:
> @@ -105,8 +107,9 @@ have config options ending in ``_KUNIT_TEST``.
> KUnit and KUnit tests can be compiled as modules: in this case the tests in a
> module will be run when the module is loaded.
>
> -Running the tests
> ------------------
> +
> +Running the tests (w/o KUnit Wrapper)
> +-------------------------------------
>
> Build and run your kernel as usual. Test output will be written to the kernel
> log in `TAP <https://testanything.org/>`_ format.
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> index 473a2361ec37..3c3fe8b5fecc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ able to run one test case per invocation.
> KUnit debugfs representation
> ============================
> When kunit test suites are initialized, they create an associated directory
> -in /sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>. The directory contains one file
> +in ``/sys/kernel/debug/kunit/<test-suite>``. The directory contains one file
>
> - results: "cat results" displays results of each test case and the results
> of the entire suite for the last test run.
> @@ -604,4 +604,4 @@ The debugfs representation is primarily of use when kunit test suites are
> run in a native environment, either as modules or builtin. Having a way
> to display results like this is valuable as otherwise results can be
> intermixed with other events in dmesg output. The maximum size of each
> -results file is KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (defined in include/kunit/test.h).
> +results file is KUNIT_LOG_SIZE bytes (defined in ``include/kunit/test.h``).
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 9b0c46a6ca1f..b8a8434443b0 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ struct kunit_suite {
> void (*exit)(struct kunit *test);
> struct kunit_case *test_cases;
>
> - /* private - internal use only */
> + /* private: internal use only */
> struct dentry *debugfs;
> char *log;
> };
> @@ -232,12 +232,13 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
> * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
> * with KUnit.
> *
> - * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
> + * @...: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite, assigned
> + * to the pointer @suites.
Err...we only have one param. I was fine with changing the name in the
kernel doc to `@...`, or something like `@suites_list...`, but I am not
okay with using both like this. I am posting a diff of what I am
thinking below.
> *
> * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
> * more information.
> *
> - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
> + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
> * that they cannot test anything where tests must run at a different init
> * phase. One significant restriction resulting from this is that KUnit
> * cannot reliably test anything that is initialize in the late_init phase;
> --
> 2.20.1
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index 9b0c46a6ca1f..dce68c59ac76 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
* kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite
* with KUnit.
*
- * @suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
+ * @suites_list: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite.
*
- * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
+ * Registers @suites_list with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for
* more information.
*
* When builtin, KUnit tests are all run as late_initcalls; this means
@@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites);
* tests from the same place, and at the very least to do so after
* everything else is definitely initialized.
*/
-#define kunit_test_suites(...) \
- static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL}; \
+#define kunit_test_suites(suites_list...) \
+ static struct kunit_suite *suites[] = {suites_list, NULL}; \
static int kunit_test_suites_init(void) \
{ \
return __kunit_test_suites_init(suites); \
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-13 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-09 21:27 [PATCH v3] Documentation: test.h - fix warnings Lothar Rubusch
2020-04-13 19:33 ` Brendan Higgins [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200413193325.GA74301@google.com \
--to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=l.rubusch@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox