From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114D2C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 10:56:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61F62088E for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 10:56:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590663394; bh=8CgwqSD7FbFvIGgxB8tScQMyzULSJiYFcTKOgBAiwQc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=zW4TogM+H3BeVAcgSejYDrS2N1+nT9Y8o1rcZ8EEsbe9vMds4/C6YFJHWH1XB4z7R rLvUzZ7BCFwHqYqh6T20jHlG2aD4fqVIk+LSyDXgSkLlZOyJptXE0ck4FIuFHOySJx ePr9VdWDGodNxb4RkP0afTqpGOXV8heAcMw0i2+I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387950AbgE1K4e (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 06:56:34 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48500 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387926AbgE1K4e (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 06:56:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24CE120888; Thu, 28 May 2020 10:56:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590663393; bh=8CgwqSD7FbFvIGgxB8tScQMyzULSJiYFcTKOgBAiwQc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fStPkTQipiuj77vcWwUO9FB4A+IroYZVbZo5RM1uIpAn2+WVsBMeFGhWbkkGHkWmK BqDPsBeNPPe/kHNn4vkXbquqZYpYKdr99ex3cK5BGgGuoXNOxzZzulHKYkocNZUfoG fqlBdrNHSkd4xNs1yYFbtjWlve5iLizOAvwwnaNc= Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:56:31 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Jiri Benc , Alexei Starovoitov Cc: shuah , Yauheni Kaliuta , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf , Jiri Olsa , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: split -extras target to -static and -gen Message-ID: <20200528105631.GE3115014@kroah.com> References: <20200528100557.20489f04@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200528100557.20489f04@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:05:57AM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2020 15:23:13 -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > I prefer to keep selftests/bpf install broken. > > This forced marriage between kselftests and selftests/bpf > > never worked well. I think it's a time to free them up from each other. > > Alexei, it would be great if you could cooperate with other people > instead of pushing your own way. The selftests infrastructure was put > to the kernel to have one place for testing. Inventing yet another way > to add tests does not help anyone. You don't own the kernel. We're > community, we should cooperate. I agree, we rely on the infrastructure of the kselftests framework so that testing systems do not have to create "custom" frameworks to handle all of the individual variants that could easily crop up here. Let's keep it easy for people to run and use these tests, to not do so is to ensure that they are not used, which is the exact opposite goal of creating tests. thanks, greg k-h