From: Yannick Cote <ycote@redhat.com>
To: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, joe.lawrence@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/livepatch: fix mem leaks in test-klp-shadow-vars
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 09:48:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528134849.7890-5-ycote@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200528134849.7890-1-ycote@redhat.com>
In some cases, when an error occurs during testing and the main test
routine returns, a memory leak occurs via leaving previously registered
shadow variables allocated in the kernel as well as shadow_ptr list
elements. From now on, in case of error, remove all allocated shadow
variables and shadow_ptr struct elements.
Signed-off-by: Yannick Cote <ycote@redhat.com>
---
lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c b/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
index 195309e1edf3..c6d631d826e0 100644
--- a/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
+++ b/lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
char *pndup[NUM_OBJS];
int nfields2[NUM_OBJS], *pnfields2[NUM_OBJS], **sv2[NUM_OBJS];
void **sv;
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
int i;
ptr_id(NULL);
@@ -192,12 +193,16 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
/* alloc a few svars with different <obj> and <id>. */
sv1[i] = shadow_alloc(&objs[i], SV_ID1, sizeof(pnfields1[i]),
GFP_KERNEL, shadow_ctor, &pnfields1[i]);
- if (!sv1[i])
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!sv1[i]) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
sv2[i] = shadow_alloc(&objs[i], SV_ID2, sizeof(pnfields2[i]),
GFP_KERNEL, shadow_ctor, &pnfields2[i]);
- if (!sv2[i])
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!sv2[i]) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
}
/* pass 2: verify we find allocated svars and where they point to */
@@ -205,7 +210,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
/* check the "char" svar for all objects */
sv = shadow_get(&objs[i], SV_ID1);
if (!sv)
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
if ((char **)sv == sv1[i] && *sv1[i] == pnfields1[i])
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv1[i]), ptr_id(*sv1[i]));
@@ -213,7 +218,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
/* check the "int" svar for all objects */
sv = shadow_get(&objs[i], SV_ID2);
if (!sv)
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
if ((int **)sv == sv2[i] && *sv2[i] == pnfields2[i])
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv2[i]), ptr_id(*sv2[i]));
@@ -224,7 +229,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
sv = shadow_get_or_alloc(&objs[i], SV_ID1, sizeof(pndup[i]),
GFP_KERNEL, shadow_ctor, &pndup[i]);
if (!sv)
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
if ((char **)sv == sv1[i] && *sv1[i] == pnfields1[i])
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv1[i]), ptr_id(*sv1[i]));
@@ -242,7 +247,7 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
for (i = 0; i < NUM_OBJS; i++) {
sv = shadow_get(&objs[i], SV_ID2); /* 'int' pairs */
if (!sv)
- return -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
if ((int **)sv == sv2[i] && *sv2[i] == pnfields2[i])
pr_info(" got expected PTR%d -> PTR%d result\n",
ptr_id(sv2[i]), ptr_id(*sv2[i]));
@@ -259,6 +264,12 @@ static int test_klp_shadow_vars_init(void)
free_ptr_list();
return 0;
+out:
+ shadow_free_all(SV_ID1, NULL); /* 'char' pairs */
+ shadow_free_all(SV_ID2, NULL); /* 'int' pairs */
+ free_ptr_list();
+
+ return ret;
}
static void test_klp_shadow_vars_exit(void)
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 13:48 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/livepatch: rework of test-klp-{callbacks,shadow_vars} Yannick Cote
2020-05-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/livepatch: rework test-klp-callbacks to use completion variables Yannick Cote
2020-06-02 8:16 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/livepatch: rework test-klp-shadow-vars Yannick Cote
2020-06-02 9:25 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-28 13:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/livepatch: more verification in test-klp-shadow-vars Yannick Cote
2020-06-01 11:27 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-06-01 11:39 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-06-02 12:35 ` Petr Mladek
2020-05-28 13:48 ` Yannick Cote [this message]
2020-06-02 9:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] selftests/livepatch: fix mem leaks " Petr Mladek
2020-05-29 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/4] selftests/livepatch: rework of test-klp-{callbacks,shadow_vars} Joe Lawrence
2020-06-01 11:48 ` Miroslav Benes
2020-06-02 5:01 ` Kamalesh Babulal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200528134849.7890-5-ycote@redhat.com \
--to=ycote@redhat.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox