From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C63C433E2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 03:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEDB2145D for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 03:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="uaWxMc0O" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728350AbgIIDAu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:00:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:50703 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727804AbgIIDAu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 23:00:50 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BmRbg2x0Gz9sTX; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:00:47 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1599620447; bh=3sMO884hg7pPLK7RKjxOZTh+vUD/yFzH8k0FjgNvOok=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uaWxMc0OMTr1wT+EG8NLJgY72MEJ32VhO4TLbXpDfqMIzmrLbH29lQ6JnUTONVx0x BZlAZPt3+huulhPQhxvbnk8TkpY0LY4iqvZWxyELQKL0So61IFOeCvg+ZRMU6kTamW wyU5VNazyX/xdSYYSD3mu/vviL0pqGy7w2xGTqoV3l4xSKQmJ/uwFldU7Jv4daUC8k xCRer2a8AftNyH7pXTpHw2XxTXH+/puJjJr+ePzazfA58pklYRFFOYDLJKt6zPrrg8 yRB6X4wiKEvniWJe0GgevNTULo4Z0PkwziAnufQqwhAMez3MM24jamB8jC6FFon0g0 wKmyr1gXzfbuQ== Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 13:00:46 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Qian Cai Cc: skhan@linuxfoundation.org, brendanhiggins@google.com, urielguajardo@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: ubsan integration Message-ID: <20200909130046.118fe505@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200903123824.GA4225@lca.pw> References: <20200806174326.3577537-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com> <20200806174326.3577537-2-urielguajardojr@gmail.com> <20200902125223.GA5676@lca.pw> <20200903123824.GA4225@lca.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/zfuNZ91fUths2EWrVnzCG=u"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/zfuNZ91fUths2EWrVnzCG=u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Qian, On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 08:38:25 -0400 Qian Cai wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 08:52:24AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:43:26PM +0000, Uriel Guajardo wrote: =20 > > > Integrates UBSAN into the KUnit testing framework. It fails KUnit tes= ts > > > whenever it reports undefined behavior. > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Uriel Guajardo =20 > >=20 > > It looks like this patch had been merged into linux-next but the "[PATC= H 1/2] > > kunit: support failure from dynamic analysis tools" did not. Hence, it = caused a > > compiling failure. > >=20 > > lib/ubsan.c: In function =E2=80=98ubsan_prologue=E2=80=99: > > lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function =E2=80=98kun= it_fail_current_test=E2=80=99; did you mean =E2=80=98kunit_init_test=E2=80= =99? [-Werror=3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > > kunit_fail_current_test(); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > kunit_init_test > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors =20 >=20 > Stephen, Shuah, can you revert this commit or pick up its dependency as w= ell? Sorry, for the slow response ... this should be gone today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/zfuNZ91fUths2EWrVnzCG=u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl9YRV4ACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gw8EQf/c1VzFm3ro9TFRsYuojPzJHb6J39cJzCwYjxVJ9yH1Qcf0d1rUbpt6w1W 8+EupMS6gQrVVzdawHGApftrxHuV8ELNRDVNsRo07V9E/cjbdHSaB7gXvnoCrjzR msDborabO43BmnOVFs2Ji54y7Fl1Uy6EiTl9hDYXCEC3clXZaFL2FOU4myWaFLd0 kZJD4/pEcbe56T5Javo/fQFZCKYxC3jHGOeE1QQZ7yilSRsYFBLbvH5eTaOSDFOm TIeuV0erCW3wrqKvhjz6ZWJHlilxSiBCnIPWuEu8dq+rcrXzGzvFDkWJs0REJU70 P90MDo8f4SV1Zgav4daSHApS5PnpLQ== =qlg+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zfuNZ91fUths2EWrVnzCG=u--