From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946D3C43457 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463CF2084C for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406663AbgJPLCu (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:02:50 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:62194 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404974AbgJPLCs (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:02:48 -0400 IronPort-SDR: e/xQHlQ8ja4o8VLHLDkxxPDG75Fhl26jK+k1RcxpI4SZBzJ/ExQf2QNDA7LcIX4kYW10/XQZbA HASz5qBPEo3w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9775"; a="184141570" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="184141570" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 04:02:44 -0700 IronPort-SDR: bWYn6iBl3xrzvMrKlpBR4JCXTpuJmM2+z0c/5xaD5PTiNc/qbb3wBcb0sYkrInKGO0O8sEIH+I Lzpkmld5qOKQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,382,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="314861494" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 04:02:42 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kTNWS-008BXo-Mg; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:03:44 +0300 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:03:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Shuah Khan , Matti Vaittinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/linear_ranges_kunit: Follow new file name convention for KUnit tests Message-ID: <20201016110344.GJ4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20201015184416.38999-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201015184416.38999-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201016103841.GA5274@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201016103841.GA5274@sirena.org.uk> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:38:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:44:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > > with KUnit-based ones. > > I'm missing the rest of this series - what's the story with dependencies > here? There is a dependency in Makefile. Do you want me to send a new version with Cc'ing you all? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko