From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EE0C4742C for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF622224B for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728063AbgKPKlI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 05:41:08 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:53329 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727192AbgKPKlI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 05:41:08 -0500 IronPort-SDR: /VdsBdkhrRbSA73CD/k5EpZpBh0ZeiuKr3qo9lNELNuu2GNzlECfKNH7v7DnMINFdaYSAutuGu 6pm84PNkE3Yw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9806"; a="234881983" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,482,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="234881983" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2020 02:41:07 -0800 IronPort-SDR: fMl7HwzPRmkIQ4P+1r9JT8orOb0MTIJsIwEtBxFP1mqU7mR8RtJljgIAmDuuEjiboDRYdvmils yUYDaTekGLEQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,482,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="367667328" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2020 02:41:05 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kebxX-0072l4-B1; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:42:07 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:42:07 +0200 From: "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" To: "Vaittinen, Matti" Cc: "vitor@massaru.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "kunit-dev@googlegroups.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "skhan@linuxfoundation.org" , "brendanhiggins@google.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "davidgow@google.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] lib/linear_ranges_kunit: Follow new file name convention for KUnit tests Message-ID: <20201116104207.GW4077@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20201112180732.75589-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20201112180732.75589-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <0204dd7bd9107b03883c4ffeb9e2bf3d467ab9a6.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0204dd7bd9107b03883c4ffeb9e2bf3d467ab9a6.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 06:22:08AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 20:07 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > > with KUnit-based ones. > Sorry for late reaction. I need to adjust my mail filters. The KUnit > mails evaded my inbox even when I was in CC. I have own folder for > KUnit - which I do not look daily. (And no Brendan, the folder is not > called "trash", its's "kunit" and I do occasionally skim through the > mails there). > > I see this was already applied so it is late - but I wanted to say > thank you for taking care of this Andy. It looks good to me. You are welcome! And thanks for review. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko