From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
To: davidgow@google.com
Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] kunit: tool: stop using bare asserts in unit test
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:32:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130233242.78413-3-dlatypov@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130233242.78413-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Use self.assertEqual/assertNotEqual() instead.
Besides being more appropriate in a unit test, it'll also give a better
error message by show the unexpected values.
Also
* Delete redundant check of exception types. self.assertRaises does this.
* s/kall/call. There's no reason to name it this way.
* This is probably a misunderstanding from the docs which uses it
since `mock.call` is in scope as `call`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
---
tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 50 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
index 9f1f1e1b772a..e527ce9d3295 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
@@ -308,26 +308,26 @@ class KUnitMainTest(KUnitTest):
def test_config_passes_args_pass(self):
kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 0
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0)
def test_build_passes_args_pass(self):
kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 0
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0)
self.linux_source_mock.build_um_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 0
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0)
def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self):
kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 0
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(build_dir='.kunit', timeout=300)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
def test_run_passes_args_pass(self):
kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
build_dir='.kunit', timeout=300)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
@@ -336,35 +336,33 @@ class KUnitMainTest(KUnitTest):
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[])
with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e:
kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert type(e.exception) == SystemExit
- assert e.exception.code == 1
+ self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1)
def test_run_passes_args_fail(self):
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[])
with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e:
kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert type(e.exception) == SystemExit
- assert e.exception.code == 1
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains(' 0 tests run'))
def test_exec_raw_output(self):
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[])
kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 1
- for kall in self.print_mock.call_args_list:
- assert kall != mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
- assert kall != mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run'))
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
+ for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list:
+ self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.')))
+ self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run')))
def test_run_raw_output(self):
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[])
kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
- assert self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count == 1
- for kall in self.print_mock.call_args_list:
- assert kall != mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
- assert kall != mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run'))
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
+ for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list:
+ self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.')))
+ self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run')))
def test_exec_timeout(self):
timeout = 3453
@@ -375,7 +373,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(KUnitTest):
def test_run_timeout(self):
timeout = 3453
kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
build_dir='.kunit', timeout=timeout)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
@@ -383,7 +381,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(KUnitTest):
def test_run_builddir(self):
build_dir = '.kunit'
kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
build_dir=build_dir, timeout=300)
self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
@@ -391,7 +389,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(KUnitTest):
def test_config_builddir(self):
build_dir = '.kunit'
kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock)
- assert self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count == 1
+ self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
def test_build_builddir(self):
build_dir = '.kunit'
--
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 23:32 [PATCH 1/5] kunit: tool: fix unit test cleanup handling Daniel Latypov
2020-11-30 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] kunit: tool: fix unit test so it can run from non-root dir Daniel Latypov
2020-12-01 7:32 ` David Gow
2020-12-01 18:59 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-12-02 4:41 ` David Gow
2020-12-02 19:11 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-11-30 23:32 ` Daniel Latypov [this message]
2020-12-01 7:33 ` [PATCH 3/5] kunit: tool: stop using bare asserts in unit test David Gow
2020-11-30 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] kunit: tool: use `with open()` " Daniel Latypov
2020-12-01 7:33 ` David Gow
2020-12-01 18:41 ` Daniel Latypov
2020-11-30 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] minor: kunit: tool: s/get_absolute_path/test_data_path " Daniel Latypov
2020-12-01 7:33 ` David Gow
2020-12-01 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] kunit: tool: fix unit test cleanup handling David Gow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130233242.78413-3-dlatypov@google.com \
--to=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox