From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5344EC4361B for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226A123A5E for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 03:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727680AbgLTDgD (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 22:36:03 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58030 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727651AbgLTDgC (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 22:36:02 -0500 From: Sasha Levin Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=permerror (bad message/signature format) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker , John Fastabend , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 12/15] selftests/bpf: Fix "dubious pointer arithmetic" test Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 22:34:30 -0500 Message-Id: <20201220033434.2728348-12-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20201220033434.2728348-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20201220033434.2728348-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [ Upstream commit 3615bdf6d9b19db12b1589861609b4f1c6a8d303 ] The verifier trace changed following a bugfix. After checking the 64-bit sign, only the upper bit mask is known, not bit 31. Update the test accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c index c548aded65859..2a15aa3d49c74 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c @@ -456,10 +456,10 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { */ {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775806,smax_value=9223372036854775806,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>=0 */ - {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, - {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access * attempt will fail. */ - {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372034707292158,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fffffff7ffffffc)"}, + {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, } }, { -- 2.27.0