From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/8] selftests: arm64: Use a define for the number of SVE ptrace tests to be run
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:54:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913125505.52619-2-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913125505.52619-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Partly in preparation for future refactoring move from hard coding the
number of tests in main() to putting #define at the top of the source
instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
index 612d3899614a..7f7ed1c96867 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-ptrace.c
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
#include "../../kselftest.h"
+#define EXPECTED_TESTS 20
+
/* <linux/elf.h> and <sys/auxv.h> don't like each other, so: */
#ifndef NT_ARM_SVE
#define NT_ARM_SVE 0x405
@@ -313,7 +315,7 @@ int main(void)
pid_t child;
ksft_print_header();
- ksft_set_plan(20);
+ ksft_set_plan(EXPECTED_TESTS);
if (!(getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_SVE))
ksft_exit_skip("SVE not available\n");
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-13 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-13 12:54 [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:54 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-13 12:54 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] selftests: arm64: Don't log child creation as a test in SVE ptrace test Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] selftests: arm64: Remove extraneous register setting code Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] selftests: arm64: Document what the SVE ptrace test is doing Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] selftests: arm64: Clarify output when verifying SVE register set Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] selftests: arm64: Verify interoperation of SVE and FPSIMD register sets Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] selftests: arm64: More comprehensively test the SVE ptrace interface Mark Brown
2021-09-13 12:55 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] selftests: arm64: Move FPSIMD in SVE ptrace test into a function Mark Brown
2021-09-29 17:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] selftests: arm64: SVE ptrace test rework Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210913125505.52619-2-broonie@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).