From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: selftest: Test suppression indication on key prot exception
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 19:02:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220401170247.1287354-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220401170247.1287354-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Check that suppression is not indicated on injection of a key checked
protection exception caused by a memop after it already modified guest
memory, as that violates the definition of suppression.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index b04c2c1b3c30..93664fbf0fef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static int err_memop_ioctl(struct test_vcpu vcpu, struct kvm_s390_mem_op *ksmo)
#define SIDA_OFFSET(o) ._sida_offset = 1, .sida_offset = (o)
#define AR(a) ._ar = 1, .ar = (a)
#define KEY(a) .f_key = 1, .key = (a)
+#define INJECT .f_inject = 1
#define CHECK_N_DO(f, ...) ({ f(__VA_ARGS__, CHECK_ONLY); f(__VA_ARGS__); })
@@ -430,9 +431,18 @@ static void test_copy_key_fetch_prot(void)
TEST_ASSERT(rv == 4, "Should result in protection exception"); \
})
+static void guest_error_key(void)
+{
+ GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_INITED);
+ set_storage_key_range(mem1, PAGE_SIZE, 0x18);
+ set_storage_key_range(mem1 + PAGE_SIZE, sizeof(mem1) - PAGE_SIZE, 0x98);
+ GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
+ GUEST_SYNC(STAGE_IDLED);
+}
+
static void test_errors_key(void)
{
- struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot);
+ struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key);
HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
@@ -446,6 +456,36 @@ static void test_errors_key(void)
kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
}
+static void test_termination(void)
+{
+ struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_error_key);
+ uint64_t prefix;
+ uint64_t teid;
+ uint64_t psw[2];
+
+ HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_INITED);
+ HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_SKEYS_SET);
+
+ /* vcpu, mismatching keys after first page */
+ ERR_PROT_MOP(t.vcpu, LOGICAL, WRITE, mem1, t.size, GADDR_V(mem1), KEY(1), INJECT);
+ /*
+ * The memop injected a program exception and the test needs to check the
+ * Translation-Exception Identification (TEID). It is necessary to run
+ * the guest in order to be able to read the TEID from guest memory.
+ * Set the guest program new PSW, so the guest state is not clobbered.
+ */
+ prefix = t.run->s.regs.prefix;
+ psw[0] = t.run->psw_mask;
+ psw[1] = t.run->psw_addr;
+ MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, WRITE, psw, sizeof(psw), GADDR(prefix + 464));
+ HOST_SYNC(t.vcpu, STAGE_IDLED);
+ MOP(t.vm, ABSOLUTE, READ, &teid, sizeof(teid), GADDR(prefix + 168));
+ /* Bits 56, 60, 61 form a code, 0 being the only one allowing for termination */
+ ASSERT_EQ(teid & 0x4c, 0);
+
+ kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
+}
+
static void test_errors_key_storage_prot_override(void)
{
struct test_default t = test_default_init(guest_copy_key_fetch_prot);
@@ -668,6 +708,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
test_copy_key_fetch_prot();
test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override();
test_errors_key();
+ test_termination();
test_errors_key_storage_prot_override();
test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled();
test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled();
--
2.32.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 17:02 [PATCH 0/2] Dirtying, failing memop: don't indicate suppression Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-04-01 17:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: Don't indicate suppression on dirtying, failing memop Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-04-01 17:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2022-04-01 17:40 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch
2022-04-01 17:02 ` Janis Schoetterl-Glausch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220401170247.1287354-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--to=scgl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).