From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 4/5] selftests/arm64: Remove casts to/from void in check_tags_inclusion
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 17:45:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220510164520.768783-5-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220510164520.768783-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Void pointers may be freely used with other pointer types in C, any casts
between void * and other pointer types serve no purpose other than to
mask potential warnings. Drop such casts from check_tags_inclusion to
help with future review of the code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
.../arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c | 24 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
index d180ba3df990..2b1425b92b69 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int verify_mte_pointer_validity(char *ptr, int mode)
{
mte_initialize_current_context(mode, (uintptr_t)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check the validity of the tagged pointer */
- memset((void *)ptr, '1', BUFFER_SIZE);
+ memset(ptr, '1', BUFFER_SIZE);
mte_wait_after_trig();
if (cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid) {
ksft_print_msg("Unexpected fault recorded for %p-%p in mode %x\n",
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
char *ptr;
int tag, run, ret, result = KSFT_PASS;
- ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
+ ptr = mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
if (check_allocated_memory(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE,
mem_type, false) != KSFT_PASS)
return KSFT_FAIL;
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
result = KSFT_FAIL;
/* Try to catch a excluded tag by a number of tries. */
for (run = 0; (run < RUNS) && (result == KSFT_PASS); run++) {
- ptr = (char *)mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
+ ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check tag value */
if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) == tag) {
ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n",
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
result = verify_mte_pointer_validity(ptr, mode);
}
}
- mte_free_memory_tag_range((void *)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
+ mte_free_memory_tag_range(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
return result;
}
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
int tag, run, result = KSFT_PASS;
unsigned long excl_mask = 0;
- ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
+ ptr = mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
if (check_allocated_memory(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE,
mem_type, false) != KSFT_PASS)
return KSFT_FAIL;
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
mte_switch_mode(mode, MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAGS(excl_mask));
/* Try to catch a excluded tag by a number of tries. */
for (run = 0; (run < RUNS) && (result == KSFT_PASS); run++) {
- ptr = (char *)mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
+ ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check tag value */
if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) < tag) {
ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n",
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
result = verify_mte_pointer_validity(ptr, mode);
}
}
- mte_free_memory_tag_range((void *)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
+ mte_free_memory_tag_range(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
return result;
}
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static int check_all_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
char *ptr;
int run, ret, result = KSFT_PASS;
- ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
+ ptr = mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
if (check_allocated_memory(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE + MT_GRANULE_SIZE,
mem_type, false) != KSFT_PASS)
return KSFT_FAIL;
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static int check_all_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
*/
result = verify_mte_pointer_validity(ptr, mode);
}
- mte_free_memory_tag_range((void *)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
+ mte_free_memory_tag_range(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, MT_GRANULE_SIZE);
return result;
}
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static int check_none_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
char *ptr;
int run, ret;
- ptr = (char *)mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
+ ptr = mte_allocate_memory(BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, 0, false);
if (check_allocated_memory(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, false) != KSFT_PASS)
return KSFT_FAIL;
@@ -159,12 +159,12 @@ static int check_none_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
}
mte_initialize_current_context(mode, (uintptr_t)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check the write validity of the untagged pointer */
- memset((void *)ptr, '1', BUFFER_SIZE);
+ memset(ptr, '1', BUFFER_SIZE);
mte_wait_after_trig();
if (cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid)
break;
}
- mte_free_memory((void *)ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, false);
+ mte_free_memory(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE, mem_type, false);
if (cur_mte_cxt.fault_valid)
return KSFT_FAIL;
else
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-10 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-10 16:45 [PATCH v1 0/5] selftests/arm64: MTE check_tags_inclusion cleanups Mark Brown
2022-05-10 16:45 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] selftests/arm64: Log errors in verify_mte_pointer_validity() Mark Brown
2022-05-10 17:15 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] selftests/arm64: Allow zero tags in mte_switch_mode() Mark Brown
2022-05-10 17:17 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:45 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] selftests/arm64: Check failures to set tags in check_tags_inclusion Mark Brown
2022-05-10 17:19 ` Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:45 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-05-10 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] selftests/arm64: Remove casts to/from void " Shuah Khan
2022-05-10 16:45 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] selftests/arm64: Use switch statements in mte_common_util.c Mark Brown
2022-05-15 10:45 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] selftests/arm64: MTE check_tags_inclusion cleanups Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220510164520.768783-5-broonie@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox