From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B22C00140 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 06:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235233AbiHBGuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 02:50:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36038 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234145AbiHBGuO (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 02:50:14 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AA12735; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:50:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1659423013; x=1690959013; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Em4r8waKeUhhrtXpfrHO7VA66HUnkdX4I+KJBKy59zY=; b=i9m2hzue420/jzXqaKcUqPJ/s+kZH3bwfmekhGRIv6N8j20sJGYxf4wU 1BbpCPgCdoyf19YUMSsFaYZiZmfvv+7TFDio7pUuBHMpJAOsm70klRZTH ghRS3YTdQcFqtH+ZcaaCcEJErb34r4Zvn0bHsqsCTsiUi/vxEY16p1Ucq uZ3Ku4T17Oqj5mvZGHTpJw6dcoDIxtcAj8wZbGf4+c9SCaklW4lOi9YJR UR2Dn/WhxcLqnmENkGHTSfsDBHO/fKAfd5JJfKljvDQuwUK0dG6jK+AZz 1z74Z9a9cuSxLu5rVP2yBBwK7L8+1i04wwBFOMbb2pIuz7Lvahk6r+I3V Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10426"; a="351045286" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,210,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="351045286" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Aug 2022 23:50:12 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,210,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="744561851" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e0eace57cfef) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2022 23:50:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e0eace57cfef with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oIljD-000Fn7-39; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 06:50:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:49:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Gautam Menghani , steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Gautam Menghani , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/net: Refactor xfrm_fill_key() to use array of structs Message-ID: <202208021442.LI0ioKrz-lkp@intel.com> References: <20220731170316.71542-1-gautammenghani201@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220731170316.71542-1-gautammenghani201@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi Gautam, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on klassert-ipsec-next/master] [also build test WARNING on klassert-ipsec/master net-next/master net/master linus/master v5.19 next-20220728] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Gautam-Menghani/selftests-net-Refactor-xfrm_fill_key-to-use-array-of-structs/20220801-010446 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0 reproduce: # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/deea0844458f9991c45aff2949b7180a95105752 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Gautam-Menghani/selftests-net-Refactor-xfrm_fill_key-to-use-array-of-structs/20220801-010446 git checkout deea0844458f9991c45aff2949b7180a95105752 make O=/tmp/kselftest headers make O=/tmp/kselftest -C tools/testing/selftests If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ipsec.c:83:1: warning: useless storage class specifier in empty declaration 83 | }; | ^ ipsec.c: In function 'xfrm_fill_key': >> ipsec.c:812:13: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable] 812 | int i = 0; | ^ -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp