From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 2/3] net: team: Unsync device addresses on ndo_stop
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:58:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220831025836.207070-3-bpoirier@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220831025836.207070-1-bpoirier@nvidia.com>
Netdev drivers are expected to call dev_{uc,mc}_sync() in their
ndo_set_rx_mode method and dev_{uc,mc}_unsync() in their ndo_stop method.
This is mentioned in the kerneldoc for those dev_* functions.
The team driver calls dev_{uc,mc}_unsync() during ndo_uninit instead of
ndo_stop. This is ineffective because address lists (dev->{uc,mc}) have
already been emptied in unregister_netdevice_many() before ndo_uninit is
called. This mistake can result in addresses being leftover on former team
ports after a team device has been deleted; see test_LAG_cleanup() in the
last patch in this series.
Add unsync calls at their expected location, team_close().
The existing unsync calls in team_port_del() are left in place because
there are other call chains that lead to team_port_del(), not just
ndo_uninit.
Fixes: 3d249d4ca7d0 ("net: introduce ethernet teaming device")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/team/team.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/team/team.c b/drivers/net/team/team.c
index aac133a1e27a..07e7187d46bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/team/team.c
+++ b/drivers/net/team/team.c
@@ -1700,6 +1700,14 @@ static int team_open(struct net_device *dev)
static int team_close(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ struct team *team = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct team_port *port;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(port, &team->port_list, list) {
+ dev_uc_unsync(port->dev, dev);
+ dev_mc_unsync(port->dev, dev);
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 2:58 [PATCH net 0/3] Unsync addresses from ports when stopping aggregated devices Benjamin Poirier
2022-08-31 2:58 ` [PATCH net 1/3] net: bonding: Unsync device addresses on ndo_stop Benjamin Poirier
2022-08-31 3:25 ` Jay Vosburgh
2022-08-31 4:36 ` Benjamin Poirier
2022-08-31 2:58 ` Benjamin Poirier [this message]
2022-08-31 2:58 ` [PATCH net 3/3] net: Add tests for bonding and team address list management Benjamin Poirier
2022-09-01 2:42 ` Benjamin Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220831025836.207070-3-bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--to=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jtoppins@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox