Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 5/6] arm64/hwcap: Add support for SVE 2.1
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:25:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221017152520.1039165-6-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017152520.1039165-1-broonie@kernel.org>

FEAT_SVE2p1 introduces a number of new SVE instructions. Since there is no
new architectural state added kernel support is simply a new hwcap which
lets userspace know that the feature is supported.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst  | 3 +++
 Documentation/arm64/sve.rst         | 1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h      | 1 +
 arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c      | 1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c         | 1 +
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg             | 1 +
 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst b/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
index a82b2cdff680..6fed84f935df 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/elf_hwcaps.rst
@@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ HWCAP2_CSSC
 HWCAP2_RPRFM
     Functionality implied by ID_AA64ISAR2_EL1.RPRFM == 0b0001.
 
+HWCAP2_SVE2P1
+    Functionality implied by ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1.SVEver == 0b0010.
+
 4. Unused AT_HWCAP bits
 -----------------------
 
diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/sve.rst b/Documentation/arm64/sve.rst
index f338ee2df46d..c7a356bf4e8f 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/sve.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/sve.rst
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ model features for SVE is included in Appendix A.
 	HWCAP2_SVEBITPERM
 	HWCAP2_SVESHA3
 	HWCAP2_SVESM4
+	HWCAP2_SVE2P1
 
   This list may be extended over time as the SVE architecture evolves.
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
index 605ec55cee70..06dd12c514e6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
 #define KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16		__khwcap2_feature(SVE_EBF16)
 #define KERNEL_HWCAP_CSSC		__khwcap2_feature(CSSC)
 #define KERNEL_HWCAP_RPRFM		__khwcap2_feature(RPRFM)
+#define KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1		__khwcap2_feature(SVE2P1)
 
 /*
  * This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
index 063cc6ea560f..b713d30544f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -95,5 +95,6 @@
 #define HWCAP2_SVE_EBF16	(1UL << 33)
 #define HWCAP2_CSSC		(1UL << 34)
 #define HWCAP2_RPRFM		(1UL << 35)
+#define HWCAP2_SVE2P1		(1UL << 36)
 
 #endif /* _UAPI__ASM_HWCAP_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 01bd72ff9617..bb1ef8cf7d04 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2750,6 +2750,7 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_elf_hwcaps[] = {
 	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1, ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1_AT_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, 1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_USCAT),
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
 	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE),
+	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_SVEver_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_SVEver_SVE2p1, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1),
 	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_SVEver_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_SVEver_SVE2, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2),
 	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_AES_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_AES_IMP, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEAES),
 	HWCAP_CAP(SYS_ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_AES_SHIFT, 4, FTR_UNSIGNED, ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1_AES_PMULL128, CAP_HWCAP, KERNEL_HWCAP_SVEPMULL),
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 85108832d86e..379695262b77 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static const char *const hwcap_str[] = {
 	[KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE_EBF16]	= "sveebf16",
 	[KERNEL_HWCAP_CSSC]		= "cssc",
 	[KERNEL_HWCAP_RPRFM]		= "rprfm",
+	[KERNEL_HWCAP_SVE2P1]		= "sve2p1",
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index a2b2e4c1c3f2..b2782b8faa01 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ EndEnum
 Enum	3:0	SVEver
 	0b0000	IMP
 	0b0001	SVE2
+	0b0010	SVE2p1
 EndEnum
 EndSysreg
 
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-17 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-17 15:25 [PATCH v1 0/6] arm64: Support for 2022 data processing instructions Mark Brown
2022-10-17 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] arm64/hwcap: Add support for FEAT_CSSC Mark Brown
2022-11-09 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-17 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] kselftest/arm64: Add FEAT_CSSC to the hwcap selftest Mark Brown
2022-11-09 17:30   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-17 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] arm64/hwcap: Add support for FEAT_RPRFM Mark Brown
2022-11-09 17:30   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-17 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] kselftest/arm64: Add FEAT_RPRFM to the hwcap test Mark Brown
2022-11-09 17:31   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-10-17 15:25 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-11-09 17:35   ` [PATCH v1 5/6] arm64/hwcap: Add support for SVE 2.1 Catalin Marinas
2022-10-17 15:25 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] kselftest/arm64: Add SVE 2.1 to hwcap test Mark Brown
2022-11-09 17:35   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-11-09 19:13 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] arm64: Support for 2022 data processing instructions Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221017152520.1039165-6-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox