From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: add 7 tests for memcmp()
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:17:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221026141725.GB19206@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221026135733.GK5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 06:57:33AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:39:22AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > Will keep thinking about it and hopefully propose a patch to make the
> > > > tests easier to use before we're too far in the 6.1 release.
> > >
> > > Another possibility is to have a separate developers' and maintainers'
> > > option. Linus and I do "make whatever" for some value of "whatever"
> > > that builds from scratch, doing whatever cleaning that might be required.
> > > Developers use targets that are faster but have the possibility of false
> > > positives and false negatives.
> > >
> > > But maybe you have something better in mind.
> > >
> > > > Thanks for keeping the conversation flowing, that helps me!
> > >
> > > Looking forward to seeing what you come up with!
> >
> > I could finally figure what was taking time in the installation process.
> > Interestingly, it's "make headers", which is not redone without a "make
> > clean" at the kernel level. The "make headers_install" only takes a few
> > hundred milliseconds, so issuing a systematic "make clean" in the nolibc
> > test dir only takes ~800ms here to perform a full rebuild, which is totally
> > acceptable to me.
> >
> > Thus what I've done is to mark the sysroot target as .phony and start it
> > with a removal of the current include dir so that we systematically rebuild
> > it. Now there's no such risk of running a test against an earlier version
> > anymore, and there are no "make clean" to worry about anymore either.
> > That looks much better to me!
> >
> > And I could confirm that just issuing:
> >
> > $ time make -j8 -C tools/testing/selftests/nolibc run
> >
> > after reverting Rasmus' fix led me to this pretty quickly:
> >
> > ...
> > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#3)
> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/k'
> > 15 memcmp_20_e0 = 64 [FAIL]
> > 16 memcmp_e0_20 = -64 [FAIL]
> > See all results in /k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out
> > make: Leaving directory '/k/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc'
> >
> > real 0m14.538s
> > user 0m27.828s
> > sys 0m4.576s
> >
> > No more false positives nor false negatives anymore. I'm sending you
> > the patch separately.
> >
> > Thanks for the discussion, the solution is way better now!
>
> Nice, looking forward to the patch!
In case you don't have it, it's this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221026054508.19634-1-w@1wt.eu/
Do not hesitate to let me know if I should resend it.
Thanks!
Willy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-26 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-21 6:03 [PATCH] selftests/nolibc: add 7 tests for memcmp() Willy Tarreau
2022-10-21 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-21 17:01 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-21 17:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-21 17:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-21 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-22 11:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-24 15:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-26 5:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-26 9:08 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-10-26 19:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-27 9:09 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-10-27 17:20 ` Willy Tarreau
2022-10-26 13:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-26 14:17 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221026141725.GB19206@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox