From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, bgardon@google.com,
seanjc@google.com, oupton@google.com, peterx@redhat.com,
vkuznets@redhat.com, dmatlack@google.com, pgonda@google.com,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Subject: [V5 PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: x86: Use host's native hypercall instruction in kvm_hypercall()
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:44:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230111004445.416840-4-vannapurve@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111004445.416840-1-vannapurve@google.com>
Use the host CPU's native hypercall instruction, i.e. VMCALL vs. VMMCALL,
in kvm_hypercall(), as relying on KVM to patch in the native hypercall on
a #UD for the "wrong" hypercall requires KVM_X86_QUIRK_FIX_HYPERCALL_INSN
to be enabled and flat out doesn't work if guest memory is encrypted with
a private key, e.g. for SEV VMs.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
index 84915bc7d689..ae1e573d94ce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
@@ -1144,9 +1144,15 @@ uint64_t kvm_hypercall(uint64_t nr, uint64_t a0, uint64_t a1, uint64_t a2,
{
uint64_t r;
- asm volatile("vmcall"
+ asm volatile("test %[use_vmmcall], %[use_vmmcall]\n\t"
+ "jnz 1f\n\t"
+ "vmcall\n\t"
+ "jmp 2f\n\t"
+ "1: vmmcall\n\t"
+ "2:"
: "=a"(r)
- : "a"(nr), "b"(a0), "c"(a1), "d"(a2), "S"(a3));
+ : "a"(nr), "b"(a0), "c"(a1), "d"(a2), "S"(a3),
+ [use_vmmcall] "r" (host_cpu_is_amd));
return r;
}
--
2.39.0.314.g84b9a713c41-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-11 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-11 0:44 [V5 PATCH 0/3] Execute hypercalls according to host cpu Vishal Annapurve
2023-01-11 0:44 ` [V5 PATCH 1/3] KVM: selftests: x86: Use "this_cpu" prefix for cpu vendor queries Vishal Annapurve
2023-01-11 0:44 ` [V5 PATCH 2/3] KVM: selftests: x86: Cache host CPU vendor (AMD vs. Intel) Vishal Annapurve
2023-01-11 0:44 ` Vishal Annapurve [this message]
2023-01-19 21:01 ` [V5 PATCH 0/3] Execute hypercalls according to host cpu Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230111004445.416840-4-vannapurve@google.com \
--to=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox