From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH rcu 2/7] rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230317031339.10277-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317031339.10277-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Although all flavors of RCU readers are annotated correctly with
lockdep as recursive read locks, they do not set the lock_acquire
'check' parameter. This means that RCU read locks are not added to
the lockdep dependency graph, which in turn means that lockdep cannot
detect RCU-based deadlocks. This is not a problem for RCU flavors having
atomic read-side critical sections because context-based annotations can
catch these deadlocks, see for example the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() statement
in synchronize_rcu(). But context-based annotations are not helpful
for sleepable RCU, especially given that it is perfectly legal to do
synchronize_srcu(&srcu1) within an srcu_read_lock(&srcu2).
However, we can detect SRCU-based by: (1) Making srcu_read_lock() a
'check'ed recursive read lock and (2) Making synchronize_srcu() a empty
write lock critical section. Even better, with the newly introduced
lock_sync(), we can avoid false positives about irq-unsafe/safe.
This commit therefore makes it so.
Note that NMI-safe SRCU read side critical sections are currently not
annotated, but might be annotated in the future.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Add comments for annotation per Waiman's suggestion ]
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/srcu.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 2 ++
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
index 74796cd7e7a9..7a745169b79a 100644
--- a/include/linux/srcu.h
+++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
@@ -102,6 +102,32 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
return lock_is_held(&ssp->dep_map);
}
+/**
+ * Annotations provide deadlock detection for SRCU.
+ *
+ * Similar to other lockdep annotations, except there is an additional
+ * srcu_lock_sync(), which is basically an empty *write*-side critical section,
+ * see lock_sync() for more information.
+ */
+
+/* Annotates a srcu_read_lock() */
+static inline void srcu_lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ lock_map_acquire_read(map);
+}
+
+/* Annotates a srcu_read_lock() */
+static inline void srcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ lock_map_release(map);
+}
+
+/* Annotates a synchronize_srcu() */
+static inline void srcu_lock_sync(struct lockdep_map *map)
+{
+ lock_map_sync(map);
+}
+
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
@@ -109,6 +135,10 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock_held(const struct srcu_struct *ssp)
return 1;
}
+#define srcu_lock_acquire(m) do { } while (0)
+#define srcu_lock_release(m) do { } while (0)
+#define srcu_lock_sync(m) do { } while (0)
+
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
#define SRCU_NMI_UNKNOWN 0x0
@@ -182,7 +212,7 @@ static inline int srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) __acquires(ssp)
srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
retval = __srcu_read_lock(ssp);
- rcu_lock_acquire(&(ssp)->dep_map);
+ srcu_lock_acquire(&(ssp)->dep_map);
return retval;
}
@@ -254,7 +284,7 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
srcu_check_nmi_safety(ssp, false);
- rcu_lock_release(&(ssp)->dep_map);
+ srcu_lock_release(&(ssp)->dep_map);
__srcu_read_unlock(ssp, idx);
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
index b12fb0cec44d..336af24e0fe3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c
@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ void synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
{
struct rcu_synchronize rs;
+ srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map);
+
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index ab4ee58af84b..c541b82646b6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -1307,6 +1307,8 @@ static void __synchronize_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool do_norm)
{
struct rcu_synchronize rcu;
+ srcu_lock_sync(&ssp->dep_map);
+
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lockdep_is_held(ssp) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 3:13 [PATCH rcu 0/7] RCU-related lockdep changes for v6.4 Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 1/7] locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync() Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 17:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-03-20 17:50 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 3/7] locking: Reduce the number of locks in ww_mutex stress tests Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-17 21:26 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 4/7] locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-20 17:50 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 5/7] rcutorture: Add SRCU deadlock scenarios Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcutorture: Add RCU Tasks Trace and " Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 7/7] rcutorture: Add srcu_lockdep.sh Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 18:19 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 19:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-20 19:28 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 20:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-20 20:26 ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 20:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230317031339.10277-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox