From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1DBEB64DC for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 17:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229535AbjGIR2X (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 13:28:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39666 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229534AbjGIR2W (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 13:28:22 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134EC8E; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 10:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 369HRrq1022299; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:27:53 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:27:53 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Zhangjin Wu , arnd@arndb.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] proc: proc_setattr for /proc/$PID/net Message-ID: <20230709172753.GA22287@1wt.eu> References: <20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-0-73176812adee@weissschuh.net> <20230630140609.263790-1-falcon@tinylab.org> <20230709092947.GF9321@1wt.eu> <3261fa5b-b239-48a2-b1a8-34f80567cde1@t-8ch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3261fa5b-b239-48a2-b1a8-34f80567cde1@t-8ch.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 07:10:58PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > Hi Willy, > > On 2023-07-09 11:29:47+0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:06:09PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > >> [..] > > > > Now queued, thanks! > > Willy > > Don't we need an Ack from the fs maintainers for the patch to > fs/proc/proc_net.c ? > > Personally I expected this series to go in via the fs tree because of > that patch. Gasp! You're totally right, I confused it with a test only changing the nolibc-test file, as the chmod_net test appeared as a dependency! Let me drop it from the series and push again. Thanks a lot for notifying me! Willy