Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Ricardo Cañuelo" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/lkdtm: Disable CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP in test config
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 17:26:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202308011724.C76E2B90@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230801094329.1878928-1-ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote:
> The lkdtm selftest config fragment enables CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP to make the
> ARRAY_BOUNDS test kill the calling process when an out-of-bound access
> is detected by UBSAN. However, after this [1] commit, UBSAN is triggered
> under many new scenarios that weren't detected before, such as in struct
> definitions with fixed-size trailing arrays used as flexible arrays. As
> a result, CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y has become a very aggressive option to
> enable except for specific situations.

Yeah, that's fair. We need to actually get these issues reported and
TRAP doesn't help with that.

> 
> `make kselftest-merge` applies CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y to the kernel config
> for all selftests, which makes many of them fail because of system hangs
> during boot.
> 
> This change removes the config option from the lkdtm kselftest and also
> the ARRAY_BOUNDS test to skip it rather than have it failing. If
> out-of-bound array accesses need to be checked, there's
> CONFIG_TEST_UBSAN for that.

I *think* instead, we can turn off TRAP but retain the ARRAY_BOUNDS
kselftest by looking for either WARN or TRAP results:

-ARRAY_BOUNDS
+ARRAY_BOUNDS call trace:|UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds

Can test that and send a v2?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01  9:43 [PATCH] selftests/lkdtm: Disable CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP in test config Ricardo Cañuelo
2023-08-02  0:26 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-08-02  6:18   ` Ricardo Cañuelo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202308011724.C76E2B90@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox