From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
To: <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>
Cc: <alexander@mihalicyn.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <fw@strlen.de>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<kuniyu@amazon.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: net/af_unix test_unix_oob [FAILED]
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 13:46:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230807204648.50070-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abf98942-0058-f2ad-8e55-fbdd83b7c2d6@alu.unizg.hr>
From: Mirsad Todorovac <mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:44:41 +0200
> Hi all,
>
> In the kernel 6.5-rc5 build on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (jammy jellyfish) on a Ryzen 7950 assembled box,
> vanilla torvalds tree kernel, the test test_unix_oob unexpectedly fails:
>
> # selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> # Test 2 failed, sigurg 23 len 63 OOB %
>
> It is this code:
>
> /* Test 2:
> * Verify that the first OOB is over written by
> * the 2nd one and the first OOB is returned as
> * part of the read, and sigurg is received.
> */
> wait_for_data(pfd, POLLIN | POLLPRI);
> len = 0;
> while (len < 70)
> len = recv(pfd, buf, 1024, MSG_PEEK);
> len = read_data(pfd, buf, 1024);
> read_oob(pfd, &oob);
> if (!signal_recvd || len != 127 || oob != '#') {
> fprintf(stderr, "Test 2 failed, sigurg %d len %d OOB %c\n",
> signal_recvd, len, oob);
> die(1);
> }
>
> In 6.5-rc4, this test was OK, so it might mean we have a regression?
Thanks for reporting.
I confirmed the test doesn't fail on net-next at least, but it's based
on v6.5-rc4.
---8<---
[root@localhost ~]# ./test_unix_oob
[root@localhost ~]# echo $?
0
[root@localhost ~]# uname -r
6.5.0-rc4-01192-g66244337512f
---8<---
I'll check 6.5-rc5 later.
>
> marvin@defiant:~/linux/kernel/linux_torvalds$ grep test_unix_oob ../kselftest-6.5-rc4-1.log
> /net/af_unix/test_unix_oob
> # selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> ok 2 selftests: net/af_unix: test_unix_oob
> marvin@defiant:~/linux/kernel/linux_torvalds$
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> NOTE: the kernel is vanilla torvalds tree, only "dirty" because the selftests were modified.
>
> Kind regards,
> Mirsad Todorovac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 19:44 selftests: net/af_unix test_unix_oob [FAILED] Mirsad Todorovac
2023-08-07 20:46 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2023-08-07 23:09 ` Mirsad Todorovac
2023-08-08 8:53 ` Mirsad Todorovac
2023-08-14 8:54 ` Mirsad Todorovac
2023-08-20 10:34 ` selftests: net/af_unix test_unix_oob [FAILED][NEW] Mirsad Todorovac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230807204648.50070-1-kuniyu@amazon.com \
--to=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox