From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Reinette Chatre" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"Maciej Wieczór-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
"Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] selftests/resctrl: Reduce failures due to outliers in MBA/MBM tests
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:20:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230929112039.7488-8-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230929112039.7488-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
The initial value of 5% chosen for the maximum allowed percentage
difference between resctrl mbm value and IMC mbm value in commit
06bd03a57f8c ("selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting
format") was "randomly chosen value" (as admitted by the changelog).
When running tests in our lab across a large number platforms, 5%
difference upper bound for success seems a bit on the low side for the
MBA and MBM tests. Some platforms produce outliers that are slightly
above that, typically 6-7%, which leads MBA/MBM test frequently
failing.
Replace the "randomly chosen value" with a success bound that is based
on those measurements across large number of platforms by relaxing the
MBA/MBM success bound to 8%. The relaxed bound removes the failures due
the frequent outliers.
Fixes: 06bd03a57f8c ("selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format")
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
index cf8284dadcb2..d3bf4368341e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_mba"
#define NUM_OF_RUNS 5
-#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 5
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 8
#define ALLOCATION_MAX 100
#define ALLOCATION_MIN 10
#define ALLOCATION_STEP 10
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index 1ae131a2e246..d3c0d30c676a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
#include "resctrl.h"
#define RESULT_FILE_NAME "result_mbm"
-#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 5
+#define MAX_DIFF_PERCENT 8
#define NUM_OF_RUNS 5
static int
--
2.30.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-29 11:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] selftests/resctrl: Fixes to failing tests Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] selftests/resctrl: Fix uninitialized .sa_flags Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 16:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-10-02 9:46 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] selftests/resctrl: Extend signal handler coverage to unmount on receiving signal Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 16:55 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] selftests/resctrl: Remove duplicate feature check from CMT test Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] selftests/resctrl: Move _GNU_SOURCE define into Makefile Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] selftests/resctrl: Refactor feature check to use resource and feature name Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature checks Ilpo Järvinen
2023-09-29 11:20 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230929112039.7488-8-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox