From: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] KVM: selftests: Take large C-state exit latency into consideration
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:37:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240413053749.74313-1-zide.chen@intel.com> (raw)
Currently, the migration worker delays 1-10 us, assuming that one
KVM_RUN iteration only takes a few microseconds. But if C-state exit
latencies are large enough, for example, hundreds or even thousands
of microseconds on server CPUs, it may happen that it's not able to
bring the target CPU out of C-state before the migration worker starts
to migrate it to the next CPU.
If the system workload is light, most CPUs could be at a certain level
of C-state, which may result in less successful migrations and fail the
migration/KVM_RUN ratio sanity check.
This patch adds a command line option to skip the sanity check in
this case.
Additionally, seems it's reasonable to randomize the length of usleep(),
other than delay in a fixed pattern.
V2:
- removed the busy loop implementation
- add the new "-s" option
Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
index 28f97fb52044..515cfa32a925 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void *migration_worker(void *__rseq_tid)
* Use usleep() for simplicity and to avoid unnecessary kernel
* dependencies.
*/
- usleep((i % 10) + 1);
+ usleep((rand() % 10) + 1);
}
done = true;
return NULL;
@@ -186,12 +186,35 @@ static void calc_min_max_cpu(void)
"Only one usable CPU, task migration not possible");
}
+static void usage(const char *name)
+{
+ puts("");
+ printf("usage: %s [-h] [-s]\n", name);
+ printf(" -s: skip the sanity check for successful KVM_RUN.\n");
+ puts("");
+ exit(0);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int r, i, snapshot;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
u32 cpu, rseq_cpu;
+ bool skip_sanity_check = false;
+ int opt;
+
+ while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "sh")) != -1) {
+ switch (opt) {
+ case 's':
+ skip_sanity_check = true;
+ break;
+ case 'h':
+ default:
+ usage(argv[0]);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
r = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(possible_mask), &possible_mask);
TEST_ASSERT(!r, "sched_getaffinity failed, errno = %d (%s)", errno,
@@ -199,6 +222,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
calc_min_max_cpu();
+ srand(time(NULL));
+
r = rseq_register_current_thread();
TEST_ASSERT(!r, "rseq_register_current_thread failed, errno = %d (%s)",
errno, strerror(errno));
@@ -254,9 +279,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
* getcpu() to stabilize. A 2:1 migration:KVM_RUN ratio is a fairly
* conservative ratio on x86-64, which can do _more_ KVM_RUNs than
* migrations given the 1us+ delay in the migration task.
+ *
+ * Another reason why it may have small migration:KVM_RUN ratio is that,
+ * on systems with large C-state exit latency, it may happen quite often
+ * that the scheduler is not able to wake up the target CPU before the
+ * vCPU thread is scheduled to another CPU.
*/
- TEST_ASSERT(i > (NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS / 2),
- "Only performed %d KVM_RUNs, task stalled too much?", i);
+ TEST_ASSERT(skip_sanity_check || i > (NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS / 2),
+ "Only performed %d KVM_RUNs, task stalled too much? "
+ "Try to turn off C-states or run it with the -s option", i);
pthread_join(migration_thread, NULL);
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-13 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-13 5:37 Zide Chen [this message]
2024-04-15 23:23 ` [PATCH V2] KVM: selftests: Take large C-state exit latency into consideration Sean Christopherson
2024-04-16 19:43 ` Chen, Zide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240413053749.74313-1-zide.chen@intel.com \
--to=zide.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox