From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AC055A0F9; Tue, 14 May 2024 17:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715708808; cv=none; b=DC4PaGOKtmmb2lWyKrdVCW0GHm5ocUwvLyCdR4hzN4mrq3GuZvCHjjqjJTBWa9sWMj7d9a3NE08g2mv/mn4BqcPjH/OhtEmYPkrgtAtX9/g27Qs9F/Cb3fwlrx5+CcThVoQIbc9ytAESJxy2ndIWDv0mQA5YFSGRTnIjlFYEE4M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715708808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pf3snsT4ApUggqxUuq5WXr4dWvJsY8A0cMtELbN6iyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=N6jB7q4Ehxj0gef+CFI84OHGGd2u1RC3KPHHmxwH6YpB5M7sQDyLY+91HiiQj6DOwUHLpJMQ0L9xr0gBE4l5eMcSUPvtgX71qsuLfqOH6kMQl1sGqK2F9YAoVE/ZNfcIZSEXq8JHSL7IEWJ4CqyluRZWvTN6cri8ckij9XUrUX8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=Yc1eIr/5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="Yc1eIr/5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B082CC2BD10; Tue, 14 May 2024 17:46:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1715708807; bh=pf3snsT4ApUggqxUuq5WXr4dWvJsY8A0cMtELbN6iyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Yc1eIr/5mrQpnqcpaIGwTMHtbnLOFYPLR2tOanTod3JH8rW5KkZOPwwLHdSGt8lXJ OIygOx/TZA9ysjw8XzqPaVjlozr0S8wX4sEa10bzBrJG2Uc5tGix+gvH1xBLzy2ZRP c7oXQDmeEFMcA3hKNhiBK19J9Q4n6iAyNWGKRRVI= Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 10:46:46 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: jeffxu@chromium.org Cc: keescook@chromium.org, jannh@google.com, sroettger@google.com, willy@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com, corbet@lwn.net, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, surenb@google.com, merimus@google.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pedro.falcato@gmail.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, deraadt@openbsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal Message-Id: <20240514104646.e6af4292f19b834777ec1e32@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20240415163527.626541-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> References: <20240415163527.626541-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:35:19 +0000 jeffxu@chromium.org wrote: > This patchset proposes a new mseal() syscall for the Linux kernel. I have not moved this into mm-stable for a 6.10 merge. Mainly because of the total lack of Reviewed-by:s and Acked-by:s. The code appears to be stable enough for a merge. It's awkward that we're in conference this week, but I ask people to give consideration to the desirability of moving mseal() into mainline sometime over the next week, please.