From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Rick P. Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
jannh@google.com, bsegall@google.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFT v6 8/9] selftests/clone3: Allow tests to flag if -E2BIG is a valid error code
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 12:23:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240623-clone3-shadow-stack-v6-8-9ee7783b1fb9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240623-clone3-shadow-stack-v6-0-9ee7783b1fb9@kernel.org>
The clone_args structure is extensible, with the syscall passing in the
length of the structure. Inside the kernel we use copy_struct_from_user()
to read the struct but this has the unfortunate side effect of silently
accepting some overrun in the structure size providing the extra data is
all zeros. This means that we can't discover the clone3() features that
the running kernel supports by simply probing with various struct sizes.
We need to check this for the benefit of test systems which run newer
kselftests on old kernels.
Add a flag which can be set on a test to indicate that clone3() may return
-E2BIG due to the use of newer struct versions. Currently no tests need
this but it will become an issue for testing clone3() support for shadow
stacks, the support for shadow stacks is already present on x86.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
index 3b3a08e6a34d..26221661e9ae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/clone3/clone3.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct test {
size_t size;
size_function size_function;
int expected;
+ bool e2big_valid;
enum test_mode test_mode;
filter_function filter;
};
@@ -153,6 +154,11 @@ static void test_clone3(const struct test *test)
ksft_print_msg("[%d] clone3() with flags says: %d expected %d\n",
getpid(), ret, test->expected);
if (ret != test->expected) {
+ if (test->e2big_valid && ret == -E2BIG) {
+ ksft_print_msg("Test reported -E2BIG\n");
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s\n", test->name);
+ return;
+ }
ksft_print_msg(
"[%d] Result (%d) is different than expected (%d)\n",
getpid(), ret, test->expected);
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-23 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-23 11:23 [PATCH RFT v6 0/9] fork: Support shadow stacks in clone3() Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 1/9] Documentation: userspace-api: Add shadow stack API documentation Mark Brown
2024-06-25 22:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 2/9] selftests: Provide helper header for shadow stack testing Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 3/9] mm: Introduce ARCH_HAS_USER_SHADOW_STACK Mark Brown
2024-07-16 4:38 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 4/9] fork: Add shadow stack support to clone3() Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 5/9] selftests/clone3: Remove redundant flushes of output streams Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 6/9] selftests/clone3: Factor more of main loop into test_clone3() Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 7/9] selftests/clone3: Explicitly handle child exits due to signals Mark Brown
2024-06-23 11:23 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2024-06-23 11:23 ` [PATCH RFT v6 9/9] selftests/clone3: Test shadow stack support Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240623-clone3-shadow-stack-v6-8-9ee7783b1fb9@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).