From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
To: tj@kernel.org, mkoutny@suse.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-kernel@vger.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan.x@bytedance.com, shuah@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] cgroup/rstat: Tracking cgroup-level niced CPU time
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 11:47:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002184717.153302-2-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002184717.153302-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahn6@gmail.com>
Cgroup-level CPU statistics currently include time spent on
user/system processes, but do not include niced CPU time (despite
already being tracked). This patch exposes niced CPU time to the
userspace, allowing users to get a better understanding of their
hardware limits and can facilitate more informed workload distribution.
A new field 'ntime' is added to struct cgroup_base_stat as opposed to
struct task_cputime to minimize footprint.
Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/cgroup-defs.h | 1 +
kernel/cgroup/rstat.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
index ae04035b6cbe..a2fcb3db6c52 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup-defs.h
@@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ struct cgroup_base_stat {
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
u64 forceidle_sum;
#endif
+ u64 ntime;
};
/*
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
index a06b45272411..5877974ece92 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/rstat.c
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static void cgroup_base_stat_add(struct cgroup_base_stat *dst_bstat,
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
dst_bstat->forceidle_sum += src_bstat->forceidle_sum;
#endif
+ dst_bstat->ntime += src_bstat->ntime;
}
static void cgroup_base_stat_sub(struct cgroup_base_stat *dst_bstat,
@@ -455,6 +456,7 @@ static void cgroup_base_stat_sub(struct cgroup_base_stat *dst_bstat,
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
dst_bstat->forceidle_sum -= src_bstat->forceidle_sum;
#endif
+ dst_bstat->ntime -= src_bstat->ntime;
}
static void cgroup_base_stat_flush(struct cgroup *cgrp, int cpu)
@@ -534,8 +536,10 @@ void __cgroup_account_cputime_field(struct cgroup *cgrp,
rstatc = cgroup_base_stat_cputime_account_begin(cgrp, &flags);
switch (index) {
- case CPUTIME_USER:
case CPUTIME_NICE:
+ rstatc->bstat.ntime += delta_exec;
+ fallthrough;
+ case CPUTIME_USER:
rstatc->bstat.cputime.utime += delta_exec;
break;
case CPUTIME_SYSTEM:
@@ -591,6 +595,7 @@ static void root_cgroup_cputime(struct cgroup_base_stat *bstat)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
bstat->forceidle_sum += cpustat[CPUTIME_FORCEIDLE];
#endif
+ bstat->ntime += cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
}
}
@@ -608,13 +613,14 @@ static void cgroup_force_idle_show(struct seq_file *seq, struct cgroup_base_stat
void cgroup_base_stat_cputime_show(struct seq_file *seq)
{
struct cgroup *cgrp = seq_css(seq)->cgroup;
- u64 usage, utime, stime;
+ u64 usage, utime, stime, ntime;
if (cgroup_parent(cgrp)) {
cgroup_rstat_flush_hold(cgrp);
usage = cgrp->bstat.cputime.sum_exec_runtime;
cputime_adjust(&cgrp->bstat.cputime, &cgrp->prev_cputime,
&utime, &stime);
+ ntime = cgrp->bstat.ntime;
cgroup_rstat_flush_release(cgrp);
} else {
/* cgrp->bstat of root is not actually used, reuse it */
@@ -622,16 +628,19 @@ void cgroup_base_stat_cputime_show(struct seq_file *seq)
usage = cgrp->bstat.cputime.sum_exec_runtime;
utime = cgrp->bstat.cputime.utime;
stime = cgrp->bstat.cputime.stime;
+ ntime = cgrp->bstat.ntime;
}
do_div(usage, NSEC_PER_USEC);
do_div(utime, NSEC_PER_USEC);
do_div(stime, NSEC_PER_USEC);
+ do_div(ntime, NSEC_PER_USEC);
seq_printf(seq, "usage_usec %llu\n"
- "user_usec %llu\n"
- "system_usec %llu\n",
- usage, utime, stime);
+ "user_usec %llu\n"
+ "system_usec %llu\n"
+ "nice_usec %llu\n",
+ usage, utime, stime, ntime);
cgroup_force_idle_show(seq, &cgrp->bstat);
}
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 18:47 [PATCH v4 0/2] Exposing nice CPU usage to userspace Joshua Hahn
2024-10-02 18:47 ` Joshua Hahn [this message]
2024-10-02 18:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cgroup/rstat: Selftests for niced CPU statistics Joshua Hahn
2024-10-08 18:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] Exposing nice CPU usage to userspace Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241002184717.153302-2-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--to=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox