Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"Daniel T. Lee" <danieltimlee@gmail.com>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: Migrate BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE test cases to prog_tests
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:29:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241022152913.574836-4-jrife@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022152913.574836-1-jrife@google.com>

Move the "load w/o expected_attach_type" test case to
prog_tests/sock_create.c and drop the remaining test case, as it is made
redundant with the existing coverage inside prog_tests/sock_create.c.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c    | 35 +++++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c       | 28 ---------------
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
index 17a3713621dd..187ffc5e60c4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_create.c
@@ -237,6 +237,19 @@ static struct sock_create_test {
 
 		.error = DENY_CREATE,
 	},
+	{
+		.descr = "load w/o expected_attach_type (compat mode)",
+		.insns = {
+			/* return 1 */
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.expected_attach_type = 0,
+		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
+
+		.domain = AF_INET,
+		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
+	},
 };
 
 static int load_prog(const struct bpf_insn *insns,
@@ -291,16 +304,18 @@ static int run_test(int cgroup_fd, struct sock_create_test *test)
 		goto detach_prog;
 	}
 
-	err = getsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, test->optname, &optval, &optlen);
-	if (err) {
-		log_err("Failed to call getsockopt");
-		goto cleanup;
-	}
-
-	if (optval != test->optval) {
-		errno = 0;
-		log_err("getsockopt returned unexpected optval");
-		goto cleanup;
+	if (test->optname) {
+		err = getsockopt(sock_fd, SOL_SOCKET, test->optname, &optval, &optlen);
+		if (err) {
+			log_err("Failed to call getsockopt");
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
+
+		if (optval != test->optval) {
+			errno = 0;
+			log_err("getsockopt returned unexpected optval");
+			goto cleanup;
+		}
 	}
 
 	ret = test->error != OK;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index 26dff88abbaa..f97850f1d84a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -47,34 +47,6 @@ struct sock_test {
 };
 
 static struct sock_test tests[] = {
-	{
-		.descr = "sock_create load w/o expected_attach_type (compat mode)",
-		.insns = {
-			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
-			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-		},
-		.expected_attach_type = 0,
-		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.domain = AF_INET,
-		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
-		.ip = "127.0.0.1",
-		.port = 8097,
-		.result = SUCCESS,
-	},
-	{
-		.descr = "sock_create load w/ expected_attach_type",
-		.insns = {
-			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
-			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-		},
-		.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE,
-		.domain = AF_INET,
-		.type = SOCK_STREAM,
-		.ip = "127.0.0.1",
-		.port = 8097,
-		.result = SUCCESS,
-	},
 };
 
 static size_t probe_prog_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
-- 
2.47.0.105.g07ac214952-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-22 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-22 15:29 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Retire test_sock.c Jordan Rife
2024-10-22 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] selftests/bpf: Migrate *_POST_BIND test cases to prog_tests Jordan Rife
2024-10-22 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] selftests/bpf: Migrate LOAD_REJECT " Jordan Rife
2024-10-22 15:29 ` Jordan Rife [this message]
2024-10-22 15:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Retire test_sock.c Jordan Rife
2024-10-22 21:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241022152913.574836-4-jrife@google.com \
    --to=jrife@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=danieltimlee@gmail.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox