Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
	Yael Chemla <ychemla@nvidia.com>,
	Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] xfrm_output: Force software GSO only in tunnel mode
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:52:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250219105248.226962-1-cratiu@nvidia.com> (raw)

The cited commit fixed a software GSO bug with VXLAN + IPSec in tunnel
mode. Unfortunately, it is slightly broader than necessary, as it also
severely affects performance for Geneve + IPSec transport mode over a
device capable of both HW GSO and IPSec crypto offload. In this case,
xfrm_output unnecessarily triggers software GSO instead of letting the
HW do it. In simple iperf3 tests over Geneve + IPSec transport mode over
a back-2-back pair of NICs with MTU 1500, the performance was observed
to be up to 6x worse when doing software GSO compared to leaving it to
the hardware.

This commit makes xfrm_output only trigger software GSO in crypto
offload cases for already encapsulated packets in tunnel mode, as not
doing so would then cause the inner tunnel skb->inner_networking_header
to be overwritten and break software GSO for that packet later if the
device turns out to not be capable of HW GSO.

Taking a closer look at the conditions for the original bug, to better
understand the reasons for this change:
- vxlan_build_skb -> iptunnel_handle_offloads sets inner_protocol and
  inner network header.
- then, udp_tunnel_xmit_skb -> ip_tunnel_xmit adds outer transport and
  network headers.
- later in the xmit path, xfrm_output -> xfrm_outer_mode_output ->
  xfrm4_prepare_output -> xfrm4_tunnel_encap_add overwrites the inner
  network header with the one set in ip_tunnel_xmit before adding the
  second outer header.
- __dev_queue_xmit -> validate_xmit_skb checks whether GSO segmentation
  needs to happen based on dev features. In the original bug, the hw
  couldn't segment the packets, so skb_gso_segment was invoked.
- deep in the .gso_segment callback machinery, __skb_udp_tunnel_segment
  tries to use the wrong inner network header, expecting the one set in
  iptunnel_handle_offloads but getting the one set by xfrm instead.
- a bit later, ipv6_gso_segment accesses the wrong memory based on that
  wrong inner network header.

With the new change, the original bug (or similar ones) cannot happen
again, as xfrm will now trigger software GSO before applying a tunnel.
This concern doesn't exist in packet offload mode, when the HW adds
encapsulation headers. For the non-offloaded packets (crypto in SW),
software GSO is still done unconditionally in the else branch.

Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yael Chemla <ychemla@nvidia.com>
Fixes: a204aef9fd77 ("xfrm: call xfrm_output_gso when inner_protocol is set in xfrm_output")
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
index f7abd42c077d..42f1ca513879 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
@@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		skb->encapsulation = 1;
 
 		if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
-			if (skb->inner_protocol)
+			if (skb->inner_protocol && x->props.mode == XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL)
 				return xfrm_output_gso(net, sk, skb);
 
 			skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_ESP;
-- 
2.45.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-19 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 10:52 Cosmin Ratiu [this message]
2025-02-19 14:28 ` [PATCH net] xfrm_output: Force software GSO only in tunnel mode Leon Romanovsky
2025-02-25 11:30 ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250219105248.226962-1-cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --to=cratiu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ychemla@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox