Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	"Sergey Senozhatsky" <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Neeraj Upadhyay" <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Uladzislau Rezki" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Clark Williams" <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Yuntao Wang" <ytcoode@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Guo Weikang" <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Huang Shijie" <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	"Raul E Rangel" <rrangel@chromium.org>,
	"Joel Granados" <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
	"Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@oracle.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
	zhangguopeng <zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD)" <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	"cheung wall" <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 10/10] rcu: Use _full() API to debug synchronize_rcu()
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2025 19:05:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305030505.94059-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305030505.94059-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>

Switch for using of get_state_synchronize_rcu_full() and
poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full() pair to debug a normal
synchronize_rcu() call.

Just using "not" full APIs to identify if a grace period is
passed or not might lead to a false-positive kernel splat.

It can happen, because get_state_synchronize_rcu() compresses
both normal and expedited states into one single unsigned long
value, so a poll_state_synchronize_rcu() can miss GP-completion
when synchronize_rcu()/synchronize_rcu_expedited() concurrently
run.

To address this, switch to poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full() and
get_state_synchronize_rcu_full() APIs, which use separate variables
for expedited and normal states.

Reported-by: cheung wall <zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z5ikQeVmVdsWQrdD@pc636/T/
Fixes: 988f569ae041 ("rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu() latency")
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227131613.52683-3-urezki@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h | 3 +++
 kernel/rcu/tree.c             | 8 +++-----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
index f9bed3d3f78d..4c92d4291cce 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h
@@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
 struct rcu_synchronize {
 	struct rcu_head head;
 	struct completion completion;
+
+	/* This is for debugging. */
+	struct rcu_gp_oldstate oldstate;
 };
 void wakeme_after_rcu(struct rcu_head *head);
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 131fb463ba68..fb98d4d9d9c9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1612,12 +1612,10 @@ static void rcu_sr_normal_complete(struct llist_node *node)
 {
 	struct rcu_synchronize *rs = container_of(
 		(struct rcu_head *) node, struct rcu_synchronize, head);
-	unsigned long oldstate = (unsigned long) rs->head.func;
 
 	WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) &&
-		!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate),
-		"A full grace period is not passed yet: %lu",
-		rcu_seq_diff(get_state_synchronize_rcu(), oldstate));
+		!poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs->oldstate),
+		"A full grace period is not passed yet!\n");
 
 	/* Finally. */
 	complete(&rs->completion);
@@ -3218,7 +3216,7 @@ static void synchronize_rcu_normal(void)
 	 * snapshot before adding a request.
 	 */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU))
-		rs.head.func = (void *) get_state_synchronize_rcu();
+		get_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&rs.oldstate);
 
 	rcu_sr_normal_add_req(&rs);
 
-- 
2.48.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-05  3:04 [PATCH rcu 00/10] Miscellaneous RCU changes for v6.15 Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:04 ` [PATCH rcu 01/10] rcu: Split rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult() mask parameter and use for tracing Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:04 ` [PATCH rcu 02/10] rcu: Remove READ_ONCE() for rdp->gpwrap access in __note_gp_changes() Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:04 ` [PATCH rcu 03/10] rcu: Fix get_state_synchronize_rcu_full() GP-start detection Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:04 ` [PATCH rcu 04/10] rcu-tasks: Move RCU Tasks self-tests to core_initcall() Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` [PATCH rcu 05/10] rcu/nocb: Print segment lengths in show_rcu_nocb_gp_state() Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` [PATCH rcu 06/10] context_tracking: Make RCU watch ct_kernel_exit_state() warning Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` [PATCH rcu 07/10] Flush console log from kernel_power_off() Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` [PATCH rcu 08/10] rcutorture: Allow a negative value for nfakewriters Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` [PATCH rcu 09/10] rcu: Update TREE05.boot to test normal synchronize_rcu() Boqun Feng
2025-03-05  3:05 ` Boqun Feng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250305030505.94059-11-boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rrangel@chromium.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=shijie@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=ytcoode@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=zzqq0103.hey@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox