Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>
To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org, christian.koenig@amd.com,
	ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev,  skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	song@kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, android-mm@google.com,
	simona@ffwll.ch,  corbet@lwn.net, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev,  john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,  jolsa@kernel.org,
	mykolal@fb.com, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add test for open coded dmabuf_iter
Date: Sun,  4 May 2025 22:41:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250504224149.1033867-6-tjmercier@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250504224149.1033867-1-tjmercier@google.com>

Use the same test buffers as the traditional iterator and a new BPF map
to verify the test buffers can be found with the open coded dmabuf
iterator.

Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |  5 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dmabuf_iter.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++----
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dmabuf_iter.c | 38 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 6535c8ae3c46..5e512a1d09d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -591,4 +591,9 @@ extern int bpf_iter_kmem_cache_new(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym
 extern struct kmem_cache *bpf_iter_kmem_cache_next(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym;
 extern void bpf_iter_kmem_cache_destroy(struct bpf_iter_kmem_cache *it) __weak __ksym;
 
+struct bpf_iter_dmabuf;
+extern int bpf_iter_dmabuf_new(struct bpf_iter_dmabuf *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern struct dma_buf *bpf_iter_dmabuf_next(struct bpf_iter_dmabuf *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern void bpf_iter_dmabuf_destroy(struct bpf_iter_dmabuf *it) __weak __ksym;
+
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dmabuf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dmabuf_iter.c
index 35745f4ce0f8..cc02bb555610 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dmabuf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dmabuf_iter.c
@@ -26,10 +26,11 @@ static int sysheap_dmabuf;
 static const char sysheap_test_buffer_name[DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN] = "sysheap_test_buffer_for_iter";
 static size_t sysheap_test_buffer_size;
 
-static int create_udmabuf(void)
+static int create_udmabuf(int map_fd)
 {
 	struct udmabuf_create create;
 	int dev_udmabuf;
+	bool f = false;
 
 	udmabuf_test_buffer_size = 10 * getpagesize();
 
@@ -63,10 +64,10 @@ static int create_udmabuf(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(ioctl(udmabuf, DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B, udmabuf_test_buffer_name), "name"))
 		return 1;
 
-	return 0;
+	return bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, udmabuf_test_buffer_name, &f, BPF_ANY);
 }
 
-static int create_sys_heap_dmabuf(void)
+static int create_sys_heap_dmabuf(int map_fd)
 {
 	sysheap_test_buffer_size = 20 * getpagesize();
 
@@ -77,6 +78,7 @@ static int create_sys_heap_dmabuf(void)
 		.heap_flags = 0,
 	};
 	int heap_fd, ret;
+	bool f = false;
 
 	if (!ASSERT_LE(sizeof(sysheap_test_buffer_name), DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN, "NAMETOOLONG"))
 		return 1;
@@ -95,18 +97,18 @@ static int create_sys_heap_dmabuf(void)
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(ioctl(sysheap_dmabuf, DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B, sysheap_test_buffer_name), "name"))
 		return 1;
 
-	return 0;
+	return bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, sysheap_test_buffer_name, &f, BPF_ANY);
 }
 
-static int create_test_buffers(void)
+static int create_test_buffers(int map_fd)
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = create_udmabuf();
+	ret = create_udmabuf(map_fd);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return create_sys_heap_dmabuf();
+	return create_sys_heap_dmabuf(map_fd);
 }
 
 static void destroy_test_buffers(void)
@@ -187,17 +189,46 @@ static void subtest_dmabuf_iter_check_default_iter(struct dmabuf_iter *skel)
 	close(iter_fd);
 }
 
+static void subtest_dmabuf_iter_check_open_coded(struct dmabuf_iter *skel, int map_fd)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+	char key[DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN];
+	int err, fd;
+	bool found;
+
+	/* No need to attach it, just run it directly */
+	fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.iter_dmabuf_for_each);
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd, &topts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err"))
+		return;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval"))
+		return;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key), "get next key"))
+		return;
+
+	do {
+		ASSERT_OK(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, key, &found), "lookup elem");
+		ASSERT_TRUE(found, "found test buffer");
+	} while (bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key, key));
+}
+
 void test_dmabuf_iter(void)
 {
 	struct dmabuf_iter *skel = NULL;
+	int iter_fd, map_fd;
 	char buf[256];
-	int iter_fd;
 
 	skel = dmabuf_iter__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dmabuf_iter__open_and_load"))
 		return;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_OK(create_test_buffers(), "create_buffers"))
+	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.testbuf_hash);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_FD(map_fd, "map_fd"))
+		goto destroy_skel;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(create_test_buffers(map_fd), "create_buffers"))
 		goto destroy;
 
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(dmabuf_iter__attach(skel), "skel_attach"))
@@ -215,10 +246,13 @@ void test_dmabuf_iter(void)
 
 	if (test__start_subtest("default_iter"))
 		subtest_dmabuf_iter_check_default_iter(skel);
+	if (test__start_subtest("open_coded"))
+		subtest_dmabuf_iter_check_open_coded(skel, map_fd);
 
 	close(iter_fd);
 
 destroy:
 	destroy_test_buffers();
+destroy_skel:
 	dmabuf_iter__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dmabuf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dmabuf_iter.c
index 6e80a53c4670..030654ab5717 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dmabuf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dmabuf_iter.c
@@ -9,6 +9,13 @@
 
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
+	__uint(key_size, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
+	__type(value, bool);
+	__uint(max_entries, 5);
+} testbuf_hash SEC(".maps");
+
 /**
  * Fields output by this iterator are delimited by newlines. Convert any
  * newlines in user-provided printed strings to spaces.
@@ -51,3 +58,34 @@ int dmabuf_collector(struct bpf_iter__dmabuf *ctx)
 	BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%lu\n%llu\n%s\n%s\n", inode, size, name, exporter);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int iter_dmabuf_for_each(const void *ctx)
+{
+	struct dma_buf *d;
+
+	bpf_for_each(dmabuf, d) {
+		char name[DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN];
+		const char *pname;
+		bool *found;
+
+		if (bpf_core_read(&pname, sizeof(pname), &d->name))
+			return 1;
+
+		/* Buffers are not required to be named */
+		if (!pname)
+			continue;
+
+		if (bpf_probe_read_kernel(name, sizeof(name), pname))
+			return 1;
+
+		found = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&testbuf_hash, name);
+		if (found) {
+			bool t = true;
+
+			bpf_map_update_elem(&testbuf_hash, name, &t, BPF_EXIST);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.49.0.906.g1f30a19c02-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-04 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-04 22:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] Replace CONFIG_DMABUF_SYSFS_STATS with BPF T.J. Mercier
2025-05-04 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] dma-buf: Rename and expose debugfs symbols T.J. Mercier
2025-05-05 11:08   ` Christian König
2025-05-04 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] bpf: Add dmabuf iterator T.J. Mercier
2025-05-05 11:16   ` Christian König
2025-05-05 16:33     ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-05 16:56       ` Christian König
2025-05-05 17:07         ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-06  0:24           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-05-04 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] bpf: Add open coded " T.J. Mercier
2025-05-04 22:41 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add test for dmabuf_iter T.J. Mercier
2025-05-04 22:41 ` T.J. Mercier [this message]
2025-05-04 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] RFC: dma-buf: Remove DMA-BUF statistics T.J. Mercier
2025-05-05 11:18   ` Christian König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250504224149.1033867-6-tjmercier@google.com \
    --to=tjmercier@google.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=android-mm@google.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox