From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9533B1494C3; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754930009; cv=none; b=ofrpNjVegsXxXzAUCq8BhJe+BGlqf6wCA8GQhO3bcV4GEFL7aLeX7O5XYu9heVj+tBJXAv8eyi7ZJ4evaqw98+B0G9CjabGyGoPLoLExZgaX2b1+oOsZWz6lM9YRYpXlDSrIS4aTxKtZdYsN5mfeH9rDhTdqS80fEeare3vTFb0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754930009; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DWcUTl2SHn7hqoaVo7YianA9NpidcOYnkPILUtfu+ps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f3leEhEoVESsqGfozVlYznm9IpveItxLQyp+3aBGP/eCBJCQcQI7yGWDrW1XEnsIXbnJjRUVtzPm6zr2PTZnjGh68+qFPQ6XMq8+DWFL5+hOd1kJ0eRbbLZlgfnJTjWBZEQb76zVgr55zZjmJZAb5/knq38KpssSbHXYvz8PKYI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jDi+FP9f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jDi+FP9f" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F337CC4CEED; Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:33:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754930009; bh=DWcUTl2SHn7hqoaVo7YianA9NpidcOYnkPILUtfu+ps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jDi+FP9fymM59E16Gk9pyLCUSHAzgYoWpj2Ku32MvF/2uINGQ4jeXGTfBcQtU5bpn lWSS6jO3B9+K9YyPT9OuiJPE1tBgZJz9kHme8+8/Igps0bW0JROgoAoE/tfpfTGTUs 04DlxUoLDx5eJqV8zSqsqWyywL9qSJ3j3QJMcEMooWOIfcBGsjYwGw/DxZTkZrlDvW odjbdWCMqVDZ2taL1Gow6Jf+Wv7AAx379bRC+q/qA7erFAxFXWjIFewd+TL9O7mMzK k48GViiV59N3gHlE2bfW1gwLasCooZI7USvS2QiK9EY+a88T561B7N74mK+QVGhZpU AUrbsc7j5SeHg== Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 09:33:28 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jay Vosburgh Cc: Hangbin Liu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Simon Horman , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Wilder Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding: don't set oif to bond dev when getting NS target destination Message-ID: <20250811093328.70343754@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <783435.1754922439@famine> References: <20250811140358.2024-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <783435.1754922439@famine> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 07:27:19 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Generically, I'm wondering if test updates should be separate > patches from the functional changes as a general policy. Yes, not sure if we made it a hard requirement, but I think it's our preference. It is the reason why we don't require cover letters for submissions with 2 patches. Hangbin, please update config for bonding tests, looks like vlans are not enabled there today. -- pw-bot: cr