[PATCH 2/3] kselftest/filelock: Report each test in oftlocks separately

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

The filelock test checks four different things but only reports an overall
status, convert to use ksft_test_result() for these individual tests. Each
test depends on the previous ones so we still bail out if any of them fail
but we get a bit more information from UIs parsing the results.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c | 90 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c
index a59fbe6aca14..25438517f214 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c
@@ -39,94 +39,82 @@ int main(void)
 	int fd = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600);
 	int fd2 = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDONLY);
 
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(4);
+
 	unlink("/tmp/aa");
 	assert(fd != -1);
 	assert(fd2 != -1);
-	ksft_print_msg("[INFO] opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2);
+	ksft_print_msg("opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2);
 
 	/* Set some read lock */
 	fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
 	fl.l_start = 5;
 	fl.l_len = 3;
 	rc = lock_set(fd, &fl);
-	if (rc == 0) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[SUCCESS] set OFD read lock on first fd\n");
-	} else {
-		ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] to set OFD read lock on first fd\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
+	ksft_test_result(rc == 0, "set OFD read lock on first fd\n");
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_finished();
+
 	/* Make sure read locks do not conflict on different fds. */
 	fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
 	fl.l_start = 5;
 	fl.l_len = 1;
 	rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl);
 	if (rc != 0)
-		return -1;
-	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
-		ksft_print_msg("[FAIL] read locks conflicted\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
+		ksft_finished();
+	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("read locks conflicted\n");
+
 	/* Make sure read/write locks do conflict on different fds. */
 	fl.l_type = F_WRLCK;
 	fl.l_start = 5;
 	fl.l_len = 1;
 	rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl);
 	if (rc != 0)
-		return -1;
-	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks conflicted\n");
-	} else {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[SUCCESS] read and write locks not conflicted\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
+		ksft_finished();
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK,
+			 "read and write locks conflicted\n");
+	if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_finished();
+
 	/* Get info about the lock on first fd. */
 	fl.l_type = F_UNLCK;
 	fl.l_start = 5;
 	fl.l_len = 1;
 	rc = lock_get(fd, &fl);
-	if (rc != 0) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
-	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
-		     fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len);
-	} else {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK did not return lock info\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK,
+			 "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK returned lock info\n");
+	if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_exit_fail();
+	ksft_print_msg("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
+		       fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len);
+
 	/* Try the same but by locking everything by len==0. */
 	fl2.l_type = F_UNLCK;
 	fl2.l_start = 0;
 	fl2.l_len = 0;
 	rc = lock_get(fd, &fl2);
-	if (rc != 0) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg
+		    ("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
+	ksft_test_result(memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl)) == 0,
+			 "F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n");
 	if (memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl))) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[FAIL] F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg
+		    ("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
 		     fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len);
-		return -1;
 	}
-	ksft_print_msg("[SUCCESS] F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n");
+
 	/* Get info about the lock on second fd - no locks on it. */
 	fl.l_type = F_UNLCK;
 	fl.l_start = 0;
 	fl.l_len = 0;
 	lock_get(fd2, &fl);
-	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) {
-		ksft_print_msg
-		    ("[FAIL] F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n");
-		return -1;
-	}
-	return 0;
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type == F_UNLCK,
+			 "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n");
+
+	ksft_finished();
 }

-- 
2.39.5