Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] tools/nolibc/time: drop invocation of gettimeofday system call
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 11:42:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251130104221.GC31522@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251122-nolibc-uapi-types-v2-4-b814a43654f5@weissschuh.net>

On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> This invocation uses libc types with a system call. While this works
> now, upcoming changes to 'struct timeval' would require type
> conversions. If types are converted anyways, the clock_gettime() based
> fallback can be used everywhere, simplifying the code.

I must confess I'm not happy to see the simple, lightweight and efficient
gettimeofday() quit, with the alternative being a bit bigger, but after
enough testing, aside the code size increase I cannot spot any problem.

> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-30 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-22 16:59 [PATCH v2 00/13] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit time-related types Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] tools/nolibc/poll: use kernel types for system call invocations Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] tools/nolibc/poll: drop __NR_poll fallback Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] tools/nolibc/select: drop non-pselect based implementations Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] tools/nolibc/time: drop invocation of gettimeofday system call Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-30 10:42   ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] tools/nolibc: prefer explicit 64-bit time-related system calls Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] tools/nolibc/gettimeofday: avoid libgcc 64-bit divisions Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] tools/nolibc/select: avoid libgcc 64-bit multiplications Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] tools/nolibc: use custom structs timespec and timeval Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit time types Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-30 10:58   ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-01  7:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-01 10:35       ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-01 10:53         ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] selftests/nolibc: test compatibility of nolibc and kernel " Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] tools/nolibc: remove time conversions Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] tools/nolibc: add __nolibc_static_assert() Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-30 11:08   ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-03 19:19     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-12-03 19:23       ` Willy Tarreau
2025-12-03 20:08         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-22 16:59 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] selftests/nolibc: add static assertions around time types handling Thomas Weißschuh
2025-11-30 11:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit time-related types Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251130104221.GC31522@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox