From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta1.formilux.org (mta1.formilux.org [51.159.59.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8F94A23; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 11:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764501028; cv=none; b=DdGQkgj/QQHXdbiso3YpDJfzPy4o3iAE6TjnLLaBEdhxMrMygnhb2gtXjH2rcueQCNOpKl6yC03A+uuU5WYMic2asM6gAoNo1ijg+j+Z4Su2lDX0AOqmwtc45rYCWr05aiffwKwsXRDEnYwp8lc3jmqO8nFhq0cYT6hiK6p2ggI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764501028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P3f1ZBUx6/MNzw2gGNkqxpbw/lCLYiS/hoqQ8hFfj/Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V9KMF+uOk1YYMneOXaogocHa2uUuD/oTXQonIjIaJLgoRepYck9bvu4BiG/i7F94qmDjizQCIvc5f5dFJV437Rh0OEOmhQDQK/zkDChF09pkdblAizSZQybjfEfARvaT+1JfqfEQAswDaIuQXRy1WTrg0wuvEZqmdnYXWv8EBI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b=E2jJtIXS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=51.159.59.229 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=1wt.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=1wt.eu header.i=@1wt.eu header.b="E2jJtIXS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1wt.eu; s=mail; t=1764501024; bh=qG8Yii2+TswSd+R2mmmIR3T4NSGVrdaAF/IKtA4ZyIs=; h=From:Message-ID:From; b=E2jJtIXSa0FFA2OhXFJ4AfKKjxUMQYI0gFf4q32pOVmFnkkbZGUMrE6fSXQtZD0Uu SErvCF3AdyCckmYgM5IWYljH2quEqg6yBELmqFHfVSrTcQu3NrHpQBmPoaWrPUgJsq mqAq7csni1iEgJ+WXXTuJHRBHIeYQv8lIt1TYb34= Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by mta1.formilux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9EAC04AB; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:10:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 5AUBAOW0000680; Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:10:24 +0100 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:10:24 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wei=DFschuh?= Cc: Shuah Khan , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] tools/nolibc: always use 64-bit time-related types Message-ID: <20251130111024.GF31522@1wt.eu> References: <20251122-nolibc-uapi-types-v2-0-b814a43654f5@weissschuh.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20251122-nolibc-uapi-types-v2-0-b814a43654f5@weissschuh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 05:59:06PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > nolibc currently uses 32-bit types for various APIs. These are > problematic as their reduced value range can lead to truncated values. > > Intended for 6.19. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh So overall I'm generally fine with the series, with some minor reserves that can be dealt with later if needed. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks! Willy