From: Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 22:04:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329140506.9595-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
In BPF, a list can only be used to implement a stack structure.
Due to an incomplete API set, only FIFO or LIFO operations are
supported. The patches enhance the BPF list API, making it more
list-like.
Five new kfuncs have been added:
bpf_list_del: remove a node from the list
bpf_list_add_impl: insert a node after a given list node
bpf_list_is_first: check if a node is the first in the list
bpf_list_is_last: check if a node is the last in the list
bpf_list_empty: check if the list is empty
refactor kfunc checks to table-driven approach, and add test cases for
the aforementioned kfuncs.
Changes in v9:
- Expand table-driven approach coverage
- Clear list node owner and unlink before drop
- Remove warnings caused by WARN_ON_ONCE()
- Introduce the __nonown_allowed suffix
Changes in v8:
- Use [patch v7 5/5] as the start of the patch series
- Introduce double pointer prev_ptr in __bpf_list_del
- Extract refactored __bpf_list_del/add into separate patches
- Allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of bpf_list_add
- Split test cases
Changes in v7:
- Replace bpf_list_node_is_edge with bpf_list_is_first/is_last
- Reimplement __bpf_list_del and __bpf_list_add
- Simplify test cases
Changes in v6:
- Merge [patch v5 (2,4,6)/6] into [patch v6 4/5]
- If list_head was 0-initialized, init it
- refactor kfunc checks to table-driven approach
Changes in v5:
- Fix bpf_obj leak on bpf_list_add_impl error
Changes in v4:
- [patch v3 1/6] Revert to version v1
- Change the parameters of bpf_list_add_impl to (head, new, prev, ...)
Changes in v3:
- Add a new lock_rec member to struct bpf_reference_state for lock
holding detection.
- Add test cases to verify that the verifier correctly restricts calls
to bpf_list_del when the spin_lock is not held.
Changes in v2:
- Remove the head parameter from bpf_list_del
- Add bpf_list_add/is_first/is_last/empty to API and test cases
Link to v8:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260316112843.78657-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v7:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260308134614.29711-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v6:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260304143459.78059-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260304031606.43884-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260303135219.33726-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260302124028.82420-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260225092651.94689-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Link to v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260209025250.55750-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com/
Kaitao Cheng (9):
bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier
bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer
bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop
bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc.
bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr
bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node
bpf: allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of
bpf_list_add_impl
bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for
bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty
Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 20 +-
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 126 ++++++-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 301 ++++++++++-------
.../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 16 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/refcounted_kptr.c | 311 ++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 636 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-29 14:04 Chengkaitao [this message]
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-30 15:20 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-30 17:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03 17:41 ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-04 4:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-04 10:38 ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-07 18:40 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-10 2:53 ` Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:45 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of bpf_list_add_impl Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260329140506.9595-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--to=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox