From: Chengkaitao <pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, chengkaitao@kylinos.cn,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 6/9] bpf: Add bpf_list_add_impl to insert node after a given list node
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 22:05:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329140506.9595-7-pilgrimtao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329140506.9595-1-pilgrimtao@gmail.com>
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Add a new kfunc bpf_list_add_impl(head, new, prev, meta, off) that
inserts 'new' after 'prev' in the BPF linked list. Both must be in
the same list; 'prev' must already be in the list. The new node must
be an owning reference (e.g. from bpf_obj_new); the kfunc consumes
that reference and the node becomes non-owning once inserted.
We have added an additional parameter bpf_list_head *head to
bpf_list_add_impl, as the verifier requires the head parameter to
check whether the lock is being held.
Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if 'prev' is not in a list or 'new'
is already in a list (or duplicate insertion). On failure, the
kernel drops the passed-in node.
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++++++--
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 669e380746a6..68c83a009275 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2447,6 +2447,19 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
return __bpf_list_add(n, head, &h->prev, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
}
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_add_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
+ struct bpf_list_node *new,
+ struct bpf_list_node *prev,
+ void *meta__ign, u64 off)
+{
+ struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)new, *p = (void *)prev;
+ struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
+ struct list_head *prev_ptr = &p->list_head;
+
+ return __bpf_list_add(n, head, &prev_ptr,
+ meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
+}
+
static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head,
struct list_head *n)
{
@@ -4585,6 +4598,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_del, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_front, KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_back, KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_add_impl)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RCU | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_release, KF_RELEASE)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_rbtree_remove, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index ae8d1f2e32de..69dcf0105973 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -12478,6 +12478,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF_bpf_refcount_acquire_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
+ KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
KF_bpf_list_pop_front,
KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
KF_bpf_list_del,
@@ -12539,6 +12540,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_obj_drop_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_refcount_acquire_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_front_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_back_impl)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_add_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_front)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_back)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_del)
@@ -12617,6 +12619,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_stream_print_stack)
static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_api_kfuncs[] = {
KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
+ KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
KF_bpf_list_pop_front,
KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
KF_bpf_list_del,
@@ -12628,6 +12631,7 @@ static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_api_kfuncs[] = {
static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_list_node_api_kfuncs[] = {
KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
+ KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
KF_bpf_list_del,
};
@@ -12681,6 +12685,7 @@ static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_stream_api_kfuncs[] = {
static const enum special_kfunc_type bpf_collection_insert_kfuncs[] = {
KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
+ KF_bpf_list_add_impl,
KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl,
};
@@ -23354,8 +23359,11 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
int struct_meta_reg = BPF_REG_3;
int node_offset_reg = BPF_REG_4;
- /* rbtree_add has extra 'less' arg, so args-to-fixup are in diff regs */
- if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl]) {
+ /* list/rbtree_add_impl have an extra arg (prev/less),
+ * so args-to-fixup are in different regs.
+ */
+ if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add_impl] ||
+ desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rbtree_add_impl]) {
struct_meta_reg = BPF_REG_4;
node_offset_reg = BPF_REG_5;
}
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-29 14:04 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/9] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/9] bpf: refactor kfunc checks using table-driven approach in verifier Chengkaitao
2026-03-30 15:20 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-03-30 17:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-04-03 17:41 ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-04 4:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-04 10:38 ` Chengkaitao
2026-04-07 18:40 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-04-10 2:53 ` Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:04 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/9] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:45 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/9] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/9] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` Chengkaitao [this message]
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 7/9] bpf: allow bpf_list_front/back result as the prev argument of bpf_list_add_impl Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 8/9] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Chengkaitao
2026-03-29 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Chengkaitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260329140506.9595-7-pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--to=pilgrimtao@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox