From: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
To: martin.lau@linux.dev, daniel@iogearbox.net,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
jiayuan.chen@linux.dev, kafai.wan@linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test TCP_NODELAY in TCP hdr opt callbacks
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:20:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417092035.2299913-3-kafai.wan@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417092035.2299913-1-kafai.wan@linux.dev>
Add a sockops selftest for the TCP_NODELAY restriction in
BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB and BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB.
With BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB_FLAG enabled,
bpf_setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY) returns -EOPNOTSUPP from
BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB and BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB, avoiding
unbounded recursion and kernel stack overflow.
Other cases continue to work as before, including
BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB and user space
setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY).
Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c | 12 +++++++++++-
.../bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
index 56685fc03c7e..7b9dbbb84316 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ static void misc(void)
const unsigned int nr_data = 2;
struct bpf_link *link;
struct sk_fds sk_fds;
- int i, ret;
+ int i, ret, true_val = 1;
lport_linum_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(misc_skel->maps.lport_linum_map);
@@ -477,6 +477,10 @@ static void misc(void)
return;
}
+ ret = setsockopt(sk_fds.active_fd, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &true_val, sizeof(true_val));
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)"))
+ goto check_linum;
+
for (i = 0; i < nr_data; i++) {
/* MSG_EOR to ensure skb will not be combined */
ret = send(sk_fds.active_fd, send_msg, sizeof(send_msg),
@@ -507,6 +511,12 @@ static void misc(void)
ASSERT_EQ(misc_skel->bss->nr_hwtstamp, 0, "nr_hwtstamp");
+ ASSERT_TRUE(misc_skel->data->nodelay_est_ok, "unexpected nodelay_est_ok");
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(misc_skel->data->nodelay_hdr_len_err, "unexpected nodelay_hdr_len_err");
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(misc_skel->data->nodelay_write_hdr_err, "unexpected nodelay_write_hdr_err");
+
check_linum:
ASSERT_FALSE(check_error_linum(&sk_fds), "check_error_linum");
sk_fds_close(&sk_fds);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
index d487153a839d..a02e28d9db2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ unsigned int nr_syn = 0;
unsigned int nr_fin = 0;
unsigned int nr_hwtstamp = 0;
+bool nodelay_est_ok = true;
+bool nodelay_hdr_len_err = true;
+bool nodelay_write_hdr_err = true;
+
/* Check the header received from the active side */
static int __check_active_hdr_in(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops, bool check_syn)
{
@@ -300,7 +304,7 @@ static int handle_passive_estab(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
SEC("sockops")
int misc_estab(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
{
- int true_val = 1;
+ int true_val = 1, false_val = 0, ret;
switch (skops->op) {
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_TCP_LISTEN_CB:
@@ -316,10 +320,19 @@ int misc_estab(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_PARSE_HDR_OPT_CB:
return handle_parse_hdr(skops);
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_HDR_OPT_LEN_CB:
+ ret = bpf_setsockopt(skops, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &true_val, sizeof(true_val));
+ nodelay_hdr_len_err &= ret == -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return handle_hdr_opt_len(skops);
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_WRITE_HDR_OPT_CB:
+ ret = bpf_setsockopt(skops, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &true_val, sizeof(true_val));
+ nodelay_write_hdr_err &= ret == -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
return handle_write_hdr_opt(skops);
case BPF_SOCK_OPS_PASSIVE_ESTABLISHED_CB:
+ ret = bpf_setsockopt(skops, SOL_TCP, TCP_NODELAY, &false_val, sizeof(false_val));
+ nodelay_est_ok &= ret == 0;
+
return handle_passive_estab(skops);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 9:20 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: Reject TCP_NODELAY in TCP header option callbacks KaFai Wan
2026-04-17 9:20 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] " KaFai Wan
2026-04-17 10:10 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-17 10:26 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-17 9:20 ` KaFai Wan [this message]
2026-04-17 10:45 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test TCP_NODELAY in TCP hdr opt callbacks Jiayuan Chen
2026-04-17 16:25 ` Martin KaFai Lau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417092035.2299913-3-kafai.wan@linux.dev \
--to=kafai.wan@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox