[PATCH bpf-next v11 10/11] selftests/bpf: Provide weak definitions for cross-test functions

["Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>]

Some test files reference functions defined in other translation units that
may not be compiled when skeletons are missing. Replace forward
declarations of uprobe_multi_func_{1,2,3}() with weak no-op stubs so the
linker resolves them regardless of which objects are present.

The stub bodies are `asm volatile ("")` rather than empty, matching the
shape of the strong definitions in prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c. This
keeps the weak and strong sides on the same footing for the optimiser
(noinline + asm-barrier), which is the form upstream already relies on
for these functions.

Move stack_mprotect() from test_lsm.c into testing_helpers.c so it is
always available. The previous weak-stub approach returned 0, which would
cause callers expecting -1/EPERM to fail their assertions
deterministically. Having the real implementation in a shared utility
avoids this problem entirely.

Include <alloca.h> for alloca() so the build does not rely on glibc's
implicit declaration via <stdlib.h>.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c  | 17 +++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c     |  2 --
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c  | 22 ----------------------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c      | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h      |  1 +
 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
index 35adc3f6d443..fa484d00a7a5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c
@@ -252,10 +252,17 @@ static void kprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest(void)
 	kprobe_multi__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-/* defined in prog_tests/uprobe_multi_test.c */
-void uprobe_multi_func_1(void);
-void uprobe_multi_func_2(void);
-void uprobe_multi_func_3(void);
+/*
+ * Weak uprobe target stubs. noinline is required because
+ * uprobe_multi_test_run() takes their addresses to configure the BPF
+ * program's attachment points; an inlined function has no stable
+ * address in the binary to probe. The strong definitions in
+ * uprobe_multi_test.c take precedence when that translation unit is
+ * linked.
+ */
+noinline __weak void uprobe_multi_func_1(void) { asm volatile (""); }
+noinline __weak void uprobe_multi_func_2(void) { asm volatile (""); }
+noinline __weak void uprobe_multi_func_3(void) { asm volatile (""); }
 
 static void uprobe_multi_test_run(struct uprobe_multi *skel)
 {
@@ -574,8 +581,6 @@ static void tracing_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel)
 		close(fmod_ret_fd);
 }
 
-int stack_mprotect(void);
-
 static void lsm_subtest(struct test_bpf_cookie *skel)
 {
 	__u64 cookie;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c
index a539980a2fbe..c0b6082f345a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/iters.c
@@ -202,8 +202,6 @@ static void subtest_task_iters(void)
 	iters_task__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-extern int stack_mprotect(void);
-
 static void subtest_css_task_iters(void)
 {
 	struct iters_css_task *skel = NULL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
index bdc4fc06bc5a..d7495efd4a56 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c
@@ -5,36 +5,14 @@
  */
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
-#include <sys/mman.h>
 #include <sys/wait.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
-#include <malloc.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
 
 #include "lsm.skel.h"
 #include "lsm_tailcall.skel.h"
 
 char *CMD_ARGS[] = {"true", NULL};
 
-#define GET_PAGE_ADDR(ADDR, PAGE_SIZE)					\
-	(char *)(((unsigned long) (ADDR + PAGE_SIZE)) & ~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
-
-int stack_mprotect(void)
-{
-	void *buf;
-	long sz;
-	int ret;
-
-	sz = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
-	if (sz < 0)
-		return sz;
-
-	buf = alloca(sz * 3);
-	ret = mprotect(GET_PAGE_ADDR(buf, sz), sz,
-		       PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 int exec_cmd(int *monitored_pid)
 {
 	int child_pid, child_status;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
index 6fbe1e995660..c970e7793dfc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include <alloca.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 #include <bpf/libbpf.h>
 #include "disasm.h"
@@ -516,3 +518,19 @@ bool is_jit_enabled(void)
 
 	return enabled;
 }
+
+int stack_mprotect(void)
+{
+	void *buf;
+	long sz;
+	int ret;
+
+	sz = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
+	if (sz < 0)
+		return sz;
+
+	buf = alloca(sz * 3);
+	ret = mprotect((void *)(((unsigned long)(buf + sz)) & ~(sz - 1)), sz,
+		       PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC);
+	return ret;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h
index 2ca2356a0b58..2edc6fb7fc52 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/testing_helpers.h
@@ -59,5 +59,6 @@ struct bpf_insn;
 int get_xlated_program(int fd_prog, struct bpf_insn **buf, __u32 *cnt);
 int testing_prog_flags(void);
 bool is_jit_enabled(void);
+int stack_mprotect(void);
 
 #endif /* __TESTING_HELPERS_H */

-- 
2.54.0