From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: leitao@debian.org
Cc: david@kernel.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, ljs@kernel.org,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org,
surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 22:42:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510144220.92522-1-lance.yang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aftnSfb15G92JON5@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 09:18:12AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:07:21AM +0800, Lance Yang wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 05:49:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>> >> + switch (type) {
>> >> + case MF_MSG_KERNEL:
>> >> + case MF_MSG_UNKNOWN:
>> >> + return true;
>> >> + case MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER:
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Rule out a concurrent buddy allocation: give the
>> >> + * allocator a moment to finish prep_new_page() and
>> >> + * re-check. A genuine high-order kernel tail page stays
>> >> + * unowned; an in-flight allocation will have bumped the
>> >> + * refcount, attached a mapping, or placed the page on
>> >> + * an LRU by now.
>> >> + */
>> >> + p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>> >> + if (!p)
>> >> + return true;
>> >> + /*
>> >> + * Yield so a concurrent allocator on another CPU can
>> >> + * finish prep_new_page() and have its writes become
>> >> + * visible before we resample the page state.
>> >> + */
>> >> + cpu_relax();
>> >> + return page_count(p) == 0 &&
>> >> + !PageLRU(p) &&
>> >> + !page_mapped(p) &&
>> >> + !page_folio(p)->mapping &&
>> >> + !is_free_buddy_page(p);
>> >
>> >I don't get what you are doing here. The right way to check for a tail page is
>> >not by checking the refcount.
>> >
>> >Further, you are not holding a folio reference? If so, calling
>> >page_mapped/folio_mapped is shaky. On concurrent folio split you can trigger a
>> >VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO().
>> >
>> >
>> >Maybe folio_snapshot() is what you are looking for, if you are in fact not
>> >holding a reference?
>>
>> Right! Maybe we should not try to make this decision in
>> panic_on_unrecoverable_mf().
>>
>> By the time we get here, we only know the final MF_MSG_* type. The
>> real reason why get_hwpoison_page() failed is already lost.
>>
>> Wonder if it would be better to split that earlier, around
>> __get_unpoison_page()/get_any_page(). That code still knows why
>> grabbing the page failed, either an unsupported kernel page or
>> just a temporary race we cannot really trust :)
>>
>> Then the later panic logic can be simple: panic for the stable
>> unsupported kernel page case, and not for the temporary race case.
>>
>> That would also avoid trying to guess MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER here:)
>
>This is a very good feedback, and definitely what I wanted to do, but,
>failed. Once we have the reason, we don't need this dance to guess the
>reason.
>
>I've hacked a patch based on this approach. How does it sound?
Yes. This direction makes sense to me, not an expert though :D
I played with something similar (untested) on top of patch #01:
---8<---
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 432d5f996c64..a2799f063913 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery __read_mostly = 1;
static int sysctl_enable_soft_offline __read_mostly = 1;
+static int sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf __read_mostly;
+
atomic_long_t num_poisoned_pages __read_mostly = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
static bool hw_memory_failure __read_mostly = false;
@@ -155,6 +157,15 @@ static const struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
.proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
.extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
.extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
+ },
+ {
+ .procname = "panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure",
+ .data = &sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
+ .extra2 = SYSCTL_ONE,
}
};
@@ -1281,6 +1292,18 @@ static void update_per_node_mf_stats(unsigned long pfn,
++mf_stats->total;
}
+static bool panic_on_unrecoverable_mf(enum mf_action_page_type type,
+ enum mf_result result)
+{
+ if (!sysctl_panic_on_unrecoverable_mf || result != MF_IGNORED)
+ return false;
+
+ if (type == MF_MSG_KERNEL)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* "Dirty/Clean" indication is not 100% accurate due to the possibility of
* setting PG_dirty outside page lock. See also comment above set_page_dirty().
@@ -1298,6 +1321,9 @@ static int action_result(unsigned long pfn, enum mf_action_page_type type,
pr_err("%#lx: recovery action for %s: %s\n",
pfn, action_page_types[type], action_name[result]);
+ if (panic_on_unrecoverable_mf(type, result))
+ panic("Memory failure: %#lx: unrecoverable page", pfn);
+
return (result == MF_RECOVERED || result == MF_DELAYED) ? 0 : -EBUSY;
}
@@ -1389,11 +1415,27 @@ static int __get_hwpoison_page(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
#define GET_PAGE_MAX_RETRY_NUM 3
-static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
+enum mf_get_page_status {
+ MF_GET_PAGE_OK = 0,
+ MF_GET_PAGE_RACE,
+ MF_GET_PAGE_UNHANDLABLE,
+};
+
+static void set_mf_get_page_status(enum mf_get_page_status *gp_status,
+ enum mf_get_page_status value)
+{
+ if (gp_status)
+ *gp_status = value;
+}
+
+static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags,
+ enum mf_get_page_status *gp_status)
{
int ret = 0, pass = 0;
bool count_increased = false;
+ set_mf_get_page_status(gp_status, MF_GET_PAGE_OK);
+
if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED)
count_increased = true;
@@ -1406,11 +1448,13 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
if (pass++ < GET_PAGE_MAX_RETRY_NUM)
goto try_again;
ret = -EBUSY;
+ set_mf_get_page_status(gp_status, MF_GET_PAGE_RACE);
} else if (!PageHuge(p) && !is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
/* We raced with put_page, retry. */
if (pass++ < GET_PAGE_MAX_RETRY_NUM)
goto try_again;
ret = -EIO;
+ set_mf_get_page_status(gp_status, MF_GET_PAGE_RACE);
}
goto out;
} else if (ret == -EBUSY) {
@@ -1423,6 +1467,7 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
goto try_again;
}
ret = -EIO;
+ set_mf_get_page_status(gp_status, MF_GET_PAGE_UNHANDLABLE);
goto out;
}
}
@@ -1442,6 +1487,7 @@ static int get_any_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
}
put_page(p);
ret = -EIO;
+ set_mf_get_page_status(gp_status, MF_GET_PAGE_UNHANDLABLE);
}
out:
if (ret == -EIO)
@@ -1480,6 +1526,7 @@ static int __get_unpoison_page(struct page *page)
* get_hwpoison_page() - Get refcount for memory error handling
* @p: Raw error page (hit by memory error)
* @flags: Flags controlling behavior of error handling
+ * @gp_status: Optional output for the reason get_any_page() failed
*
* get_hwpoison_page() takes a page refcount of an error page to handle memory
* error on it, after checking that the error page is in a well-defined state
@@ -1503,7 +1550,8 @@ static int __get_unpoison_page(struct page *page)
* operations like allocation and free,
* -EHWPOISON when the page is hwpoisoned and taken off from buddy.
*/
-static int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
+static int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags,
+ enum mf_get_page_status *gp_status)
{
int ret;
@@ -1511,7 +1559,7 @@ static int get_hwpoison_page(struct page *p, unsigned long flags)
if (flags & MF_UNPOISON)
ret = __get_unpoison_page(p);
else
- ret = get_any_page(p, flags);
+ ret = get_any_page(p, flags, gp_status);
zone_pcp_enable(page_zone(p));
return ret;
@@ -2341,6 +2389,7 @@ static int memory_failure_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
*/
int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
+ enum mf_get_page_status gp_status = MF_GET_PAGE_OK;
struct page *p;
struct folio *folio;
struct dev_pagemap *pgmap;
@@ -2413,7 +2462,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
* that may make page_ref_freeze()/page_ref_unfreeze() mismatch.
*/
is_reserved = PageReserved(p);
- res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags);
+ res = get_hwpoison_page(p, flags, &gp_status);
if (!res) {
if (is_free_buddy_page(p)) {
if (take_page_off_buddy(p)) {
@@ -2437,9 +2486,13 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
/*
* Pages with PG_reserved set are not currently managed by the
* page allocator (memblock-reserved memory, driver reservations,
- * etc.), so classify them as kernel-owned for reporting.
+ * etc.), so classify them as kernel-owned for reporting. Do the
+ * same for pages that get_any_page() still cannot handle after
+ * retries: likely non-LRU/non-buddy pages such as slab, kernel
+ * stack, page table or vmalloc-backed pages. Transient lifecycle
+ * races stay as MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON.
*/
- if (is_reserved)
+ if (is_reserved || gp_status == MF_GET_PAGE_UNHANDLABLE)
res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_KERNEL, MF_IGNORED);
else
res = action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON,
@@ -2744,7 +2797,7 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
goto unlock_mutex;
}
- ghp = get_hwpoison_page(p, MF_UNPOISON);
+ ghp = get_hwpoison_page(p, MF_UNPOISON, NULL);
if (!ghp) {
if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
huge = true;
@@ -2951,7 +3004,7 @@ int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
retry:
get_online_mems();
- ret = get_hwpoison_page(page, flags | MF_SOFT_OFFLINE);
+ ret = get_hwpoison_page(page, flags | MF_SOFT_OFFLINE, NULL);
put_online_mems();
if (hwpoison_filter(page)) {
---
I would leave MF_MSG_KERNEL_HIGH_ORDER out for now. That path still
has the allocator race David pointed out, unless there is easy way to
rule that out ...
Also would leave MF_MSG_UNKNOWN out. We don't really know what it is no?
So it's not good basis for a panic decision :)
Maybe better to keep panic_on_unrecoverable_mf simple: classify the
get_any_page() failure reason earlier, but only panic on MF_MSG_KERNEL.
IMHO, making the knob too complicated for memory failures that should be
rare does not seem worth it. Just covering MF_MSG_KERNEL should already
help crash analysis a lot :)
Feel free to pick up any bits that look useful :)
Cheers, Lance
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 12:23 [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 12:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mm/memory-failure: report MF_MSG_KERNEL for reserved pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 12:33 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-27 14:45 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 15:14 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-27 15:57 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Breno Leitao
2026-04-27 15:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-28 3:07 ` Lance Yang
2026-05-06 16:18 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-10 14:42 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] Documentation: document panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure sysctl Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 12:48 ` Andrew Morton
2026-05-06 15:38 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 12:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] selftests/mm: regression test for panic_on_unrecoverable_memory_failure Breno Leitao
2026-04-28 2:22 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-04-24 13:19 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/memory-failure: add panic option for unrecoverable pages Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-24 14:39 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-24 13:28 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260510144220.92522-1-lance.yang@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox