Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	Dimitri Daskalakis <dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
	Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: Fix checksums in xdp_native
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 18:38:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514183832.5ef205c1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513072355.1083381-1-noren@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 13 May 2026 10:23:55 +0300 Nimrod Oren wrote:
> Data adjustment cases failed with "Data exchange failed" when using IPv4
> because the program did not update the IP and UDP checksums in the IPv4
> branch. The issue was masked when both IPv4 and IPv6 were configured,
> since the test harness prefers IPv6.

Oops, maybe we should run against both IP version after all?

      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13  7:23 [PATCH net] selftests: net: Fix checksums in xdp_native Nimrod Oren
2026-05-15  1:38 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260514183832.5ef205c1@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dimitri.daskalakis1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox