Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
To: andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev, memxor@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty()
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 00:04:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260523183422.124105-1-suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com> (raw)

Simplify fq_flows_is_empty() by replacing the pop/push based emptiness
check with a direct call to bpf_list_empty().
This avoids unnecessary list mutation and simplifies the code while
preserving correctness.

Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
index 1a3233a275c7..3b05ac1d7c77 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_qdisc_fq.c
@@ -197,17 +197,13 @@ static bool
 fq_flows_is_empty(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 {
 	struct bpf_list_node *node;
+	bool empty;
 
 	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
-	node = bpf_list_pop_front(head);
-	if (node) {
-		bpf_list_push_front(head, node);
-		bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
-		return false;
-	}
+	empty = bpf_list_empty(head);
 	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 
-	return true;
+	return empty;
 }
 
 /* flow->age is used to denote the state of the flow (not-detached, detached, throttled)
-- 
2.54.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-23 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-23 18:34 Suchit Karunakaran [this message]
2026-05-23 19:20 ` [PATCH] bpf: replace pop/push emptiness check with bpf_list_empty() bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-25 18:08 ` Emil Tsalapatis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260523183422.124105-1-suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com \
    --to=suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox