From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommufd: Fix veventq_depth boundary
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:43:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260605134347.GA1962447@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1779408671.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 05:36:31PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> The upper bound of veventq_depth has been missing for veventq allocation,
> leaving a vulnerability where userspace could exhaust atomic memory pool.
>
> Fix it properly:
> - Allocate outside the spinlock to avoid GFP_ATOMIC
> - Cap the veventq_depth upper bound
> - Fix event_data byte-count
> - Add selftest coverage
>
> Note that QEMU's SMMU has been already allocating veventq using a "HW"
> EVTQ entry number. So, picking 19 as the known use case, for a minimal
> level of ABI consistency.
>
> This is on github:
> https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_veventq_depth-v2
>
> Changelog:
> v2
> * Add Reviewed-by from Jason
> * Rebase on Jason's for-rc tree
> * Update commit message for clarification
> * Move "data_len byte-count" to the first
> * Drop optimistic read in the allocation path
> v1
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1779070992.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
>
> Nicolin Chen (4):
> iommufd: Fix data_len byte-count vs element-count mismatch
> iommufd: Move vevent memory allocation outside spinlock
> iommufd: Set veventq_depth upper bound
> iommufd/selftest: Add boundary tests for veventq_depth
I applied this a few days ago
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 0:36 [PATCH rc v2 0/4] iommufd: Fix veventq_depth boundary Nicolin Chen
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 1/4] iommufd: Fix data_len byte-count vs element-count mismatch Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 2/4] iommufd: Move vevent memory allocation outside spinlock Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 3/4] iommufd: Set veventq_depth upper bound Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-05-25 18:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-05-22 0:36 ` [PATCH rc v2 4/4] iommufd/selftest: Add boundary tests for veventq_depth Nicolin Chen
2026-05-25 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-06-05 13:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260605134347.GA1962447@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox