From: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, toke@redhat.com,
lorenzo@kernel.org, paul.chaignon@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover partial copy of non-linear test_run output
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 17:31:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260616093103.471444-3-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616093103.471444-1-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
prog_run_opts already verifies that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN returns -ENOSPC
for a short data_out buffer while still reporting the full output size
through data_size_out.
Add the same coverage for non-linear test_run output. Use pass-through
TC and XDP programs with a 9000-byte packet, a 64-byte linear data area,
and a 100-byte data_out buffer. The expected output spans both the linear
data and the first fragment.
Verify that test_run returns -ENOSPC, reports the full packet length
through data_size_out, and copies the packet prefix into data_out for
both non-linear skb and XDP frags paths.
Signed-off-by: Sun Jian <sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c | 12 ++++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c
index 01f1d1b6715a..71af1ff02023 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/prog_run_opts.c
@@ -4,6 +4,10 @@
#include "test_pkt_access.skel.h"
+#define NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN 9000
+#define NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN 64
+#define SHORT_OUT_LEN 100
+
static const __u32 duration;
static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt)
@@ -20,6 +24,71 @@ static void check_run_cnt(int prog_fd, __u64 run_cnt)
"incorrect number of repetitions, want %llu have %llu\n", run_cnt, info.run_cnt);
}
+static void init_pkt(__u8 *pkt, size_t len)
+{
+ size_t i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+ pkt[i] = i & 0xff;
+}
+
+static void test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN];
+ __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN];
+ struct __sk_buff skb = {};
+ int prog_fd, err;
+
+ init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt));
+ memset(out, 0xa5, sizeof(out));
+
+ skb.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN;
+
+ topts.data_in = pkt;
+ topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt);
+ topts.data_out = out;
+ topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out);
+ topts.ctx_in = &skb;
+ topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(skb);
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.tc_pass_prog);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOSPC, "skb_nonlinear_partial_err");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(pkt), "skb_nonlinear_partial_data_size_out");
+ ASSERT_OK(memcmp(out, pkt, sizeof(out)), "skb_nonlinear_partial_data_out");
+}
+
+static void test_xdp_nonlinear_data_out_partial(struct test_pkt_access *skel)
+{
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts);
+ __u8 pkt[NONLINEAR_PKT_LEN];
+ __u8 out[SHORT_OUT_LEN];
+ struct xdp_md ctx = {};
+ int prog_fd, err;
+
+ init_pkt(pkt, sizeof(pkt));
+ memset(out, 0xa5, sizeof(out));
+
+ ctx.data = 0;
+ ctx.data_end = NONLINEAR_LINEAR_DATA_LEN;
+
+ topts.data_in = pkt;
+ topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt);
+ topts.data_out = out;
+ topts.data_size_out = sizeof(out);
+ topts.ctx_in = &ctx;
+ topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(ctx);
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.xdp_frags_pass_prog);
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, -ENOSPC, "xdp_nonlinear_partial_err");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(pkt), "xdp_nonlinear_partial_data_size_out");
+ ASSERT_OK(memcmp(out, pkt, sizeof(out)), "xdp_nonlinear_partial_data_out");
+}
+
void test_prog_run_opts(void)
{
struct test_pkt_access *skel;
@@ -69,6 +138,9 @@ void test_prog_run_opts(void)
run_cnt += topts.repeat;
check_run_cnt(prog_fd, run_cnt);
+ test_skb_nonlinear_data_out_partial(skel);
+ test_xdp_nonlinear_data_out_partial(skel);
+
cleanup:
if (skel)
test_pkt_access__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
index bce7173152c6..cd284401eebd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pkt_access.c
@@ -150,3 +150,15 @@ int test_pkt_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return TC_ACT_UNSPEC;
}
+
+SEC("tc")
+int tc_pass_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return TC_ACT_OK;
+}
+
+SEC("xdp.frags")
+int xdp_frags_pass_prog(struct xdp_md *ctx)
+{
+ return XDP_PASS;
+}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 9:31 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] Fix partial copy of non-linear test_run output Sun Jian
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf: " Sun Jian
2026-06-16 13:33 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-06-16 17:16 ` sun jian
2026-06-16 9:31 ` Sun Jian [this message]
2026-06-16 13:17 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Cover " Paul Chaignon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260616093103.471444-3-sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--to=sun.jian.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox