Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Xu Du <xudu@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests/net: Fix tun IPv6 test addresses to avoid 6to4 range
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 14:12:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260713131218.GE1364329@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706-b4-net_tun_addr-v1-1-3d3cb2473560@suse.com>

On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 01:24:04PM -0300, Ricardo B. Marlière wrote:
> The IPv6 addresses used for the tun_vnet_udptnl fixture currently fall in
> the 2002::/16 prefix, which is reserved for the 6to4 transition mechanism
> (RFC 3056).
> 
> On systems where the sit module is loaded, the kernel automatically claims
> 2002::/16 as a 6to4 tunnel prefix. When the test assigns a 2002:: address
> to a TUN interface, sit registers a competing local route for the same
> address. This ambiguity breaks the GENEVE decapsulation path: packets
> injected via the TUN fd are not delivered to the test socket, causing the
> IPv6-outer gtgso send_gso_packet variants to fail.
> 
> Replace all four IPv6 test addresses with addresses from the fd00:db8::/32
> range, which is part of the ULA space (fc00::/7, RFC 4193) and carries no
> special kernel semantics.
> 
> Fixes: 24e59f26eef2 ("selftest: tun: Add helpers for GSO over UDP tunnel")
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-13 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06 16:24 [PATCH net] selftests/net: Fix tun IPv6 test addresses to avoid 6to4 range Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-13 13:12 ` Simon Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260713131218.GE1364329@horms.kernel.org \
    --to=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rbm@suse.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=xudu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox