From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f180.google.com (mail-pl1-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 486A44D2EC4 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784720311; cv=none; b=gKhPkmVrS+d7nGdjJWn6rpPVcbYDCbad57Ow9dacRfghAqOFd2zwRYEA16eokH9OwIK88V+ZNaEsYGdcNPTny2mw2rK6nxEGxjGAyVfby0ILHthvDcBc8i0V02e0wef5B+CTQVsbDTvQv8AvXU1f6V4f/Sq0AbFO4fjFRUk1AsQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784720311; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4SUTil00fqpgPAucthU6HTl2XlqWFfYKnVVCbAIsH5c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VEiCCSymL+r5owU5gb/nSNZ3mJAEBAo5G5MrrGOzXBzgS93sfPw97i+d2L26bX/oVcMgMDvQa1rS1I2vpnw1ed+vkkKeL3balzfwIGN777qlLkdpIbyhMaoBt13F3au+Ug+0EBxYTPDhhkdFH6NN+a3D1jA63gzSMnNP1YxjE8I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=tJeV4egu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.180 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="tJeV4egu" Received: by mail-pl1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2ceae1ed204so104255085ad.0 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:38:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784720307; x=1785325107; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=Lz8wSJ72VvS/5HxQLoKKzBsvogEF0aAdv/0SLjzmBu8=; b=tJeV4eguW8FAaVkaKySpnAOrvCIjeRyybgvPdJmZscFO/Yk097+TE1rGHmf1gRu8v3 V6CetvUQmLlRegbznt3g3WqraoaKpx9yVbf9r98EBx++RA0X0mWsxhjhDToVnho+PcaN rPw91ci6f7Kwm1V5VZQO13FPSAxEH6etsR5vVQ1KiWYhflb9AHWqOgztS5I2+ZQtBsBo mQ0v/6b/UsldAr4h7dAVW6HNIz1dhpxno8KJqXJz9DahTdReSA0WQWtZtl76d0o8p72h Y+NA8NeElGpRIF9aX+YbpvL8VaC/wZ5Rv7Fhc/zdK5YfyfEN717ObgOipH6bxY9YgI9v u6mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784720307; x=1785325107; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=Lz8wSJ72VvS/5HxQLoKKzBsvogEF0aAdv/0SLjzmBu8=; b=ouoNyWj0rciTxMDxEb+XTr+h2mqT3R4ceOhGVF3L9bDgnvbdvt8lXFyTxFUa5hxo4c BmruU7PCaVzeb6rjrFgV7BPRu8sA/SkWfrlQ+S9uD36LIgSOkIHx2VJ0Cy8AcpUEX4pd eakW7xjtq5sab7I4pG5sapy5PD4Ot0g8Tqu6J8XWOvHFwsLARDeNcErCLIQkJyWZ9JgP WP1LLsVZH/AvzrK4nE39beZhAU9hD39BiObhh4RbYLpyi5yZj+krjTs2rk3EOvMMVwwm EOctvVkvPkzLDDANY71U4mXppD9JomtBOmB/c2S+A86M5La4lHH7H2tOPjGgTYYNVbWc mgRw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rp5C0ecSwdBnnPFt9DlBfjBre780cSqqUOX4g9GR+plIxm1r9p6riB+43er5+TXC3YpAZrPurNqBHJtOpK0E5c=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxYg8y0IYbur4EXC3jR2HGOrl0IFH6OuENjCEM7U0J0TWwyxc8r VtO1oYz1d/tQxprZyXX5W8QYiT5ulGDx5zXuWEyA3r/sCZY5zT4ksZSF X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10+ksVJLtH0g3k1Y0jflfMdcK+mGVIBBZWUyomKfxipX47L59pM+7qifm5aBZe JONhNzOYSKQ32BzS4nN+lCa4GV7y31Cp1O/5GGMh7GMMrnBpi+enJyypdEs8W7yLp2QslFqb14p hqRl0Uzxt3nFBrdxzyYxZlvSdKuL6Dd3eWzdEyTccJogPw/Wizc60v0UTAib46pUaxZPa6D0YJi C8PGEPyD3qVuXjgWJHjOAPkjHtkiizOhkqjZ1VdoJ1l23tr0LsPfZZtyP+6sLBy/gmpnp4U2bBF R1aylJS0XRe+wkQ28PPH0tmnc3uXY/tMtMsycK/4939WQZKJ3iVkM0b8EWaXj2PzXX3L5U87El2 iQ6Qml1iR5/1osde8rC3bh/IOgR3ehYVaFzP1agYeoJW3y92/kD6JFYeq05vyNWf8o5ycvkmOay /iqD0zJSh/kx9POMARwnvnM8HGJvMP7qvUWCZel+UKknX6vIVB1upzVxOpx2s/qf48hlB0qEV8s +Kf575ztdo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1b2e:b0:2ca:281:27f9 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2cf349978f5mr237336055ad.27.1784720307137; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kali ([115.131.60.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2cf8f31383bsm13110205ad.59.2026.07.22.04.38.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:08:09 +0930 From: Daniel Wade To: Yiyang Chen Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann , Eduard Zingerman , Emil Tsalapatis , Ihor Solodrai , John Fastabend , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Shuah Khan , Song Liu , Yonghong Song Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/3] bpf: Preserve pointer state for commuted arithmetic Message-ID: <20260722210809.382642@kali> In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Eduard, Yiyang, Thanks for the pointer. I independently tested Yiyang's v3 series on the source-matched f105f3631d51 base with the same kernel config used for my original report. Before the series, my impact witness reached chosen-address kernel read/write and changed UID/GID 65534 with CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON to UID/GID 0 in 3/3 runs. With all three v3 patches applied, the intended untrusted-pointer positive control still passed, while the impact program was rejected at "R0 pointer += pointer prohibited" before any address leak or privilege transition in 3/3 runs. I also ran the three focused cases added by the v3 series. All passed: mem_rdonly_untrusted/ldx_is_ok_commuted_addr dynptr/dynptr_slice_commuted_invalidate verifier_basic_stack/stack pointer arithmetic preserves frame number Given that the affected code has shipped and the issue reaches kernel read/write from a CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON context, should this be routed through bpf and marked for stable rather than bpf-next? For the v3 series: Tested-by: Daniel Wade Regards, Daniel