From: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: rientjes@google.com, seanjc@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
vannapurve@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com,
jiaqiyan@google.com, tabba@google.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm: memory_failure: Clarify the MF_DELAYED definition
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 19:40:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260823-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-v5-1-d97a5703e45a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260823-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-v5-0-d97a5703e45a@google.com>
This patch clarifies the definition of MF_DELAYED to represent cases
where a folio's removal is initiated but not immediately completed
(e.g., due to remaining metadata references).
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Lisa Wang <wyihan@google.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index aaf14608b30e..e698d0e9711d 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -847,24 +847,25 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
}
/*
- * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_IGNORED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* But it could not do more to isolate the page from being accessed again,
* nor does it kill the process. This is extremely rare and one of the
* potential causes is that the page state has been changed due to
* underlying race condition. This is the most severe outcomes.
*
- * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_FAILED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* It should have killed the process, but it can't isolate the page,
* due to conditions such as extra pin, unmap failure, etc. Accessing
* the page again may trigger another MCE and the process will be killed
* by the m-f() handler immediately.
*
- * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
- * The page is unmapped, and is removed from the LRU or file mapping.
- * An attempt to access the page again will trigger page fault and the
- * PF handler will kill the process.
+ * MF_DELAYED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
+ * It means the page was unmapped and partially isolated (e.g. removed from
+ * file mapping or the LRU) but full cleanup is deferred (e.g. the metadata
+ * for the memory, as in struct page/folio, is still referenced). Any
+ * further access to the page will result in the process being killed.
*
- * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoisoned'ed.
+ * MF_RECOVERED - The m-f() handler marks the page as PG_hwpoison'ed.
* The page has been completely isolated, that is, unmapped, taken out of
* the buddy system, or hole-punched out of the file mapping.
*/
--
2.55.0.766.g2966f0265a-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 19:40 [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: Fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure Lisa Wang
2026-08-23 19:40 ` Lisa Wang [this message]
2026-08-23 19:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] mm: memory_failure: Allow truncate_error_folio to return MF_DELAYED Lisa Wang
2026-08-23 19:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] mm: shmem: Update shmem handler to the MF_DELAYED definition Lisa Wang
2026-08-23 19:40 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] mm: memory_failure: Generalize extra_pins handling to all MF_DELAYED cases Lisa Wang
2026-08-23 19:40 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] mm: selftests: Add shmem into memory failure test Lisa Wang
2026-08-24 13:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260823-memory-failure-mf-delayed-fix-v5-1-d97a5703e45a@google.com \
--to=wyihan@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox