From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FBF1448CF7; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788193957; cv=none; b=S/8sItXoNKBUr/MBammmiEbWbnybxZLCoLP8RQ3yqSkbvBh4s9HNEUrwpXBKdwEq017j3XkXSIg4o1R5zUUHULXBJziHP+y7axgxGUm2OSegsNECTuOATzI6HD/IOZKeIRlLaqb+99H6Q9sZDAbA6PlFVOOiV8mBJW9Weh2DO4A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788193957; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wUsBvWnzl+Pj88Y9i6acXf4EDbp3sxiIChdWLSg1gtg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JYctzpHdgKYebuXVEGkvoJMxsUaheBoFE5LhVNBmc3gQIk+EDb12zG0KIymYhhEEwu9O7ROhe782sIhOHPJuAnZ5iTJsAzPdbK4wwHECmUQJZaInYbbd1jxYxW6UWiJfWvh1BRuTJRbHNm2gkXLG0KqK2dnYuq7VzoKiUa465kg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Gh2CsV8N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Gh2CsV8N" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DBEB1F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:32:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788193956; bh=BOkGMgfUiKktetMs2wqyvvKDq0ME2ARU2KejbrLlpOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Gh2CsV8N81h4Y5gq3qzfcDxXUBtM868JkeSq21qq3g5E6mAUYjt6GIjDAPCLHv0Ml LMlL9MNkkvlE+lvpVryUTiLyK6EAua9eRmO1slhu9wTNDt/QcpmrYZahpWrui3EhUH ePYPgTPxoJGWi7rkp/dGJmAqqmaLjtLsFv5kM3ashSRC0I3TaP/94Tu6PgWomPKS/3 jGw+yC8iM/funj40NFgK3msndpOC+JAkuIB3KEyV58dF6+NVfltX+4ZITCBLHhduvT Pq7iLiIZjJIxmC5lhBtwG4GhtkGNRCcSVpI55Hs7ms2xr6Zj+KvU/NwPk0Mh3j9ZqU O6DIBBZ9nHFUw== Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 09:32:35 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Nimrod Oren Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , Simon Horman , Jacob Keller , Willem de Bruijn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yael Chemla , Dragos Tatulea Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: drv-net: pp_alloc_fail: restore ring size after timeout Message-ID: <20260831093235.4d9ff79c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <114e426d-431a-445e-addd-dc30b2c70f0c@nvidia.com> References: <20260825090758.308167-1-noren@nvidia.com> <20260827093109.5b26bac2@kernel.org> <114e426d-431a-445e-addd-dc30b2c70f0c@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 11:05:52 +0300 Nimrod Oren wrote: > > Regarding the patch - I'm not sure we should be complicating > > tests for this. How about we make NIPA reboot the machine if > > it sees subprocess.TimeoutExpired ? Adding defer()s before > > seems like a bit of a whack-a-mole. > > Sounds good to me. Rebooting will be cleaner. Done, currently pending runs should see the new code so we'll know if it gets handled right soon.