From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADF633F7ABC; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789377294; cv=none; b=dIBVzRALgr7/O8CBT1bArxlfSCMWGzeV9GokpgZHwTyfTr2yBxyfvjLqXYw+ayx0iPYSq5PmAGiKZAcCRX5jBegRsTKDKwzIoWuacq1cCwr2B8tqZZOEGzU5EytqZK+o+t8P8Vk4n57LWk3+uf2LhzvUEWHDvj6+vC2JX6+P6a4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789377294; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NyNkhKSWWyQK1aJbTK1W8C3zHQRHZ2UtAvj2nwEN9Gc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KNiP4JFpWnHJokWrZvEBv+8zfF/F0qZYLklLccP+c9PzblWfW+dmHW3iKW/vt/ho6sXbvDX7Y+pysYLp2LQhYC/1axLYtFr02brZP/WCvyd+UnT6y+a/RkhmP+uVlkatXgT4OrH8tUDngTsLeKNtnJkhv9dysptY8XRre3chqIY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QB5vB63x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QB5vB63x" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25F161F000FF; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:14:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789377293; bh=xtmKyn3NtpgCppoFcCU4yQt0ArbHBrXV8z0icOwmUJs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=QB5vB63xxqbjDVXTJbNtzJTCKNVA1utACRdnMVxDXdL6WtpouXc0u1NLU3x5b30kr DA18sVYujCGaLjurdwwhfGutonXFH4r5OrWXG4FUyR16dJWZF1Xc8kSbaxGeE4NGDm MEx9mFEMwcOxxmt6m5w+zFNMQuelBCpAaBEQOGXBNUiOt0wofYUwRiVO+lGw0RE5LD E833aE36hwkrySCJVweFJwqjGIJwkCNoNUuotU89ykL68bEf2ZE5yZ0F6ioODnULRu 0qwmu4681dmlpgmp6Q/ZEaIuDcki1VeES5qwjqMR+7gbSUR1AysPu/fGOqwjDPA9pY 3ANj61ZA1TlZA== Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:14:48 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Jamal Hadi Salim Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Victor Nogueira , hybris Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] selftests/tc-testing: add hhf hh_limit cap tests Message-ID: <20260914091448.GO48209@horms.kernel.org> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 02:09:20PM -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > Cover the new TCA_HHF_HH_FLOWS_LIMIT bound: values above 2*HH_FLOWS_CNT > (4294967295, 65536, 2049) are rejected with the configured limit left > untouched on both the change and the add path, the boundary value 2048 is > accepted (installed at 100 first so the boundary change is load-bearing), > and an add-time hh_limit 500 is preserved instead of being clobbered by > the default. > > Reviewed-by: Victor Nogueira > Tested-by: hybris > Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim Reviewed-by: Simon Horman