From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 00:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008221947733e6a69@mail.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <asfzfFuBFVKP5WQA@shikoro>
On 08/10/2026 21:48:16+0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 11:31:08PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Here are some fixes for issues I found in 'rtctest' while checking RTC
> > drivers. Details are in the patch descriptions. Patches 1+2 have been
> > tested on HW. Patch 3 has not been tested, just follows the pattern of
> > patch 2, but may need more discussion in general. Please read there.
> > Looking forward to comments!
>
> I guess at least patches 1+2 are good to go? Who would pick them,
> Alexandre or Shuah?
>
We discussed it at LPC, I'll take the patches.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 21:31 [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: don't mention skipping twice Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: make missing UIEs really skip Wolfram Sang
2026-09-16 21:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: skip properly if setting alarm fails Wolfram Sang
2026-10-08 19:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] selftest: rtc: rtctest: improve handling of skipped tests Wolfram Sang
2026-10-08 22:19 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261008221947733e6a69@mail.local \
--to=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox