From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, memxor@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, jolsa@kernel.org,
emil@etsalapatis.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
jose.marchesi@oracle.com, david.faust@oss.qualcomm.com,
Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/7] selftests/bpf: make arena_base() opaque to GCC's -Warray-bounds
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 17:04:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028000411.4010967-5-vineet.gupta@linux.dev> (raw)
arena_base() casts the map definition to the kernel's struct bpf_arena
and reads user_vm_start out of it. In the object file that definition
is only the 32-byte BTF placeholder the loader rewrites, so the access
is past the end of the object and GCC says so:
libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h:52:69: error: array subscript 'struct bpf_arena[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct <anonymous>[1]' [-Werror=array-bounds=]
52 | #define arena_base(map) ((void __arena *)((struct bpf_arena *)(map))->user_vm_start)
progs/arena_race.c:58:30: note: in expansion of macro 'arena_base'
GCC is right; clang has the same warning but does not apply it to a
member access through a cast. With BPF_CFLAGS carrying -Werror this is
a build failure, today, for every prog that calls arena_base() and is
compiled by a GCC with arena support: verifier_arena.c,
verifier_arena_large.c, verifier_arena_globals1.c,
verifier_arena_globals2.c and arena_race.c.
Make the pointer opaque instead, which is what progs/stream.c already
does for its own open-coded copy of the same access. The bounds
analysis then has nothing to reason about, and every caller is covered
without a per-file opt-out that has to be maintained -- arena_race.c
was added without one and broke the bpf_gcc build.
The barrier is behind #ifdef __clang__ so clang keeps the plain macro.
It does not need it, and the barrier is not free: it blocks reuse of
the map address, so each call site reloads it. Across the five progs
and 20 call sites that is +35 instructions under GCC
(2528 -> 2563), about 1.4% on those objects and nothing elsewhere.
Clang output is unchanged, bit for bit.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
---
.../bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
index 82aafe879fae..4f2c6050215f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/libarena/include/bpf_arena_common.h
@@ -49,7 +49,23 @@ void __arena* bpf_arena_alloc_pages(void *map, void __arena *addr, __u32 page_cn
int bpf_arena_reserve_pages(void *map, void __arena *addr, __u32 page_cnt) __ksym __weak;
void bpf_arena_free_pages(void *map, void __arena *ptr, __u32 page_cnt) __ksym __weak;
+/*
+ * GCC's -Warray-bounds fires on the member access: the map definition the
+ * object file carries is smaller than struct bpf_arena. Make the pointer
+ * opaque to it, as the open-coded form in progs/stream.c already does.
+ * clang does not warn and does not need the barrier, which costs a reload
+ * of the map address at every call site.
+ */
+#ifdef __clang__
#define arena_base(map) ((void __arena *)((struct bpf_arena *)(map))->user_vm_start)
+#else
+#define arena_base(map) \
+({ \
+ struct bpf_arena *__ma = (void *)(map); \
+ barrier_var(__ma); \
+ (void __arena *)__ma->user_vm_start; \
+})
+#endif
#else /* when compiled as user space code */
--
2.53.0-Meta
reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028000411.4010967-5-vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--to=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=david.faust@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox