Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] mm: set the VM_MAYBE_GUARD flag on guard region install
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:17:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2bbccc79-d64e-4ace-a528-37295e3f8a4d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99ce6131e27592c92b43ac866da48b4c2a568298.1762531708.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

On 11/7/25 17:11, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Now we have established the VM_MAYBE_GUARD flag and added the capacity to
> set it atomically, do so upon MADV_GUARD_INSTALL.
> 
> The places where this flag is used currently and matter are:
> 
> * VMA merge - performed under mmap/VMA write lock, therefore excluding
>   racing writes.
> 
> * /proc/$pid/smaps - can race the write, however this isn't meaningful as
>   the flag write is performed at the point of the guard region being
>   established, and thus an smaps reader can't reasonably expect to avoid
>   races. Due to atomicity, a reader will observe either the flag being set
>   or not. Therefore consistency will be maintained.
> 
> In all other cases the flag being set is irrelevant and atomicity
> guarantees other flags will be read correctly.
> 
> Note that non-atomic updates of unrelated flags do not cause an issue with
> this flag being set atomically, as writes of other flags are performed
> under mmap/VMA write lock, and these atomic writes are performed under
> mmap/VMA read lock, which excludes the write, avoiding RMW races.
> 
> Note that we do not encounter issues with KCSAN by adjusting this flag
> atomically, as we are only updating a single bit in the flag bitmap and
> therefore we do not need to annotate these changes.
> 
> We intentionally set this flag in advance of actually updating the page
> tables, to ensure that any racing atomic read of this flag will only return
> false prior to page tables being updated, to allow for serialisation via
> page table locks.
> 
> Note that we set vma->anon_vma for anonymous mappings. This is because the
> expectation for anonymous mappings is that an anon_vma is established
> should they possess any page table mappings. This is also consistent with
> what we were doing prior to this patch (unconditionally setting anon_vma on
> guard region installation).
> 
> We also need to update retract_page_tables() to ensure that madvise(...,
> MADV_COLLAPSE) doesn't incorrectly collapse file-backed ranges contain
> guard regions.
> 
> This was previously guarded by anon_vma being set to catch MAP_PRIVATE
> cases, but the introduction of VM_MAYBE_GUARD necessitates that we check
> this flag instead.
> 
> We utilise vma_flag_test_atomic() to do so - we first perform an optimistic
> check, then after the PTE page table lock is held, we can check again
> safely, as upon guard marker install the flag is set atomically prior to
> the page table lock being taken to actually apply it.
> 
> So if the initial check fails either:
> 
> * Page table retraction acquires page table lock prior to VM_MAYBE_GUARD
>   being set - guard marker installation will be blocked until page table
>   retraction is complete.
> 
> OR:
> 
> * Guard marker installation acquires page table lock after setting
>   VM_MAYBE_GUARD, which raced and didn't pick this up in the initial
>   optimistic check, blocking page table retraction until the guard regions
>   are installed - the second VM_MAYBE_GUARD check will prevent page table
>   retraction.
> 
> Either way we're safe.
> 
> We refactor the retraction checks into a single
> file_backed_vma_is_retractable(), there doesn't seem to be any reason that
> the checks were separated as before.
> 
> Note that VM_MAYBE_GUARD being set atomically remains correct as
> vma_needs_copy() is invoked with the mmap and VMA write locks held,
> excluding any race with madvise_guard_install().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

Small nit below:

> @@ -1778,15 +1801,16 @@ static void retract_page_tables(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t pgoff)
>  			spin_lock_nested(ptl, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Huge page lock is still held, so normally the page table
> -		 * must remain empty; and we have already skipped anon_vma
> -		 * and userfaultfd_wp() vmas.  But since the mmap_lock is not
> -		 * held, it is still possible for a racing userfaultfd_ioctl()
> -		 * to have inserted ptes or markers.  Now that we hold ptlock,
> -		 * repeating the anon_vma check protects from one category,
> -		 * and repeating the userfaultfd_wp() check from another.
> +		 * Huge page lock is still held, so normally the page table must
> +		 * remain empty; and we have already skipped anon_vma and
> +		 * userfaultfd_wp() vmas.  But since the mmap_lock is not held,
> +		 * it is still possible for a racing userfaultfd_ioctl() or
> +		 * madvise() to have inserted ptes or markers.  Now that we hold
> +		 * ptlock, repeating the anon_vma check protects from one
> +		 * category, and repeating the userfaultfd_wp() check from
> +		 * another.

The last part of the comment is unchanged and mentions anon_vma check and
userfaultfd_wp() check which were there explicitly originally, but now it's
a file_backed_vma_is_retractable() check that also includes the guard region
check, so maybe could be updated?

>  		 */
> -		if (likely(!vma->anon_vma && !userfaultfd_wp(vma))) {
> +		if (likely(file_backed_vma_is_retractable(vma))) {
>  			pgt_pmd = pmdp_collapse_flush(vma, addr, pmd);
>  			pmdp_get_lockless_sync();
>  			success = true;
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 67bdfcb315b3..de918b107cfc 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -1139,15 +1139,21 @@ static long madvise_guard_install(struct madvise_behavior *madv_behavior)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If we install guard markers, then the range is no longer
> -	 * empty from a page table perspective and therefore it's
> -	 * appropriate to have an anon_vma.
> -	 *
> -	 * This ensures that on fork, we copy page tables correctly.
> +	 * Set atomically under read lock. All pertinent readers will need to
> +	 * acquire an mmap/VMA write lock to read it. All remaining readers may
> +	 * or may not see the flag set, but we don't care.
> +	 */
> +	vma_flag_set_atomic(vma, VM_MAYBE_GUARD_BIT);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If anonymous and we are establishing page tables the VMA ought to
> +	 * have an anon_vma associated with it.
>  	 */
> -	err = anon_vma_prepare(vma);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +	if (vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
> +		err = anon_vma_prepare(vma);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Optimistically try to install the guard marker pages first. If any


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 16:11 [PATCH v3 0/8] introduce VM_MAYBE_GUARD and make it sticky Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] mm: introduce VM_MAYBE_GUARD and make visible in /proc/$pid/smaps Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-17 15:11   ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-18  7:36     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-18  1:05   ` jane.chu
2025-11-18  7:33     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: add atomic VMA flags and set VM_MAYBE_GUARD as such Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 15:51   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-11-10 17:34     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 17:36   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 17:49     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 17:59   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] mm: implement sticky VMA flags Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-17 13:58   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-17 20:02   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-17 22:43     ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-18  7:46       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-19 12:55   ` Mark Brown
2025-11-19 13:37     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-19 13:16   ` Mark Brown
2025-11-19 13:27     ` Pedro Falcato
2025-11-19 13:40       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] mm: introduce copy-on-fork VMAs and make VM_MAYBE_GUARD one Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] mm: set the VM_MAYBE_GUARD flag on guard region install Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 16:17   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2025-11-10 17:37     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-10 17:43   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] tools/testing/vma: add VMA sticky userland tests Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] tools/testing/selftests/mm: add MADV_COLLAPSE test case Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-11-07 16:11 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] tools/testing/selftests/mm: add smaps visibility guard region test Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2bbccc79-d64e-4ace-a528-37295e3f8a4d@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=npache@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox